Prospect Heights vs Rolling Meadows

Which is the better fit for you?

Prospect Heights, IL
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally
Rolling Meadows, IL
59
Area Score
Top 50% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rolling Meadows receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Prospect Heights to Rolling Meadows

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$271 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,919 in Rolling Meadows against $2,190 in Prospect Heights.
The median home
6% less
$326,200 in Rolling Meadows against $346,500 in Prospect Heights.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 18°F in Rolling Meadows against 18°F in Prospect Heights; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Prospect Heights
Rolling Meadows
Opportunity: Rolling Meadows is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
38 · Bottom 14%
vs
40 · Bottom 18%
Growth: Rolling Meadows is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
14 · Bottom 2%
vs
24 · Bottom 8%
Climate
62 · Bottom 21%
vs
62 · Bottom 21%
Physical resilience
69 · Top 36%
vs
69 · Top 36%
Housing affordability
77 · Top 21%
vs
77 · Top 21%
Schools: Rolling Meadows is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
71 · Top 23%
vs
73 · Top 20%
Access: Rolling Meadows is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Prospect Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
73 · Top 18%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricProspect HeightsRolling MeadowsSource period
Population15,61824,0272024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$85,008$98,514 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$48,072 ±$3,707$46,120 ±$2,8462024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,712/sq mi4,277/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$346,500$326,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,475 ±$161$1,607 ±$1272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,190$1,919 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate66.8%71.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−3.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate41.3% ±5%43.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.3% ±3%8.4% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−75.0%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation32.3"32.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport9 mi9 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.6 min ±2.2 min27.1 min ±1.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.839.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools672024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.6 — more favorable15.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.7%50.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency46.8%47.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility39.6%28.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Prospect Heights

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Rolling Meadows

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Prospect Heights
—
Prospect Heights: Your Score
57
Area Score
Rolling Meadows
—
Rolling Meadows: Your Score
59
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Prospect Heights, IL · Rolling Meadows, IL · How this is calculated: methodology