Port Orchard vs Poulsbo

Which is the better fit for you?

Port Orchard, WA
59
Area Score
Top 50% nationally
Poulsbo, WA
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Poulsbo receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Port Orchard to Poulsbo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 107.4 against 107.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,031 in Poulsbo against $2,031 in Port Orchard.
The median home
15% more
$620,100 in Poulsbo against $539,700 in Port Orchard.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Poulsbo against 37°F in Port Orchard; July highs are 77°F against 77°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Port Orchard
Poulsbo
Opportunity: Poulsbo is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
64 · Top 34%
vs
69 · Top 26%
Growth: Poulsbo is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
68 · Top 17%
vs
72 · Top 13%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
42 · Bottom 33%
vs
42 · Bottom 33%
Housing affordability: Poulsbo is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
51 · Bottom 22%
vs
59 · Bottom 33%
Schools: Poulsbo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
45 · Bottom 44%
vs
57 · Top 41%
Access: Port Orchard is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
87 · Bottom 33%
Economic stability: Poulsbo is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
50 · Bottom 35%
vs
55 · Bottom 45%

Measured values

MetricPort OrchardPoulsboSource period
Population17,14912,1652024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$89,795$116,250 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$45,489$56,418 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,778/sq mi2,550/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$539,700$620,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,797 ±$69$1,886 ±$1882024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,031$2,031FY2026
Cost of living index107.4107.42023
Homeownership rate62.0%59.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.3%−1.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.9%49.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.1% ±3%9.4% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)39219912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents22.9 — more favorable16.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.1%+59.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high77°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation36.5"37.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi — more favorable22 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate33.0 min ±2.7 min29.7 min ±3.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.043.32024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.8 — more favorable17.82024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.9%52.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency65.0%67.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Port Orchard

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Poulsbo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Port Orchard
—
Port Orchard: Your Score
59
Area Score
Poulsbo
—
Poulsbo: Your Score
63
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Port Orchard, WA · Poulsbo, WA · How this is calculated: methodology