Plano vs Richardson

Which is the better fit for you?

Plano, TX
70
Area Score
Top 14% nationally
Richardson, TX
68
Area Score
Top 20% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Plano receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Plano to Richardson

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$45 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,316 in Richardson against $2,270 in Plano.
The median home
7% less
$431,400 in Richardson against $465,900 in Plano.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Richardson against 34°F in Plano; July highs are 97°F against 95°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Plano
Richardson
Opportunity: Richardson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
68 · Top 28%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth
64 · Top 22%
vs
64 · Top 23%
Climate: Plano is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
65 · Bottom 33%
vs
63 · Bottom 29%
Physical resilience: Plano is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
67 · Top 40%
vs
58 · Top 50%
Housing affordability: Plano is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
71 · Top 37%
Schools
71 · Top 23%
vs
71 · Top 23%
Access: Richardson is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 33%
vs
98 · Top 17%
Economic stability: Richardson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
68 · Top 28%
vs
69 · Top 27%

Measured values

MetricPlanoRichardsonSource period
Population290,594118,7312024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$112,253 — more favorable$98,1112024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$59,916 — more favorable$51,8632024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,053/sq mi4,157/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$465,900$431,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,841 ±$24$1,857 ±$372024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,270 — more favorable$2,316FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate56.9%50.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.5%4.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.2%−0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher60.5% — more favorable57.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.3% ±0.7%7.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)71676612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.56.5 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+104.0% — more favorable−4.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high95°F97°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low34°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation38.3"38.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute27.3 min25.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.633.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools74262024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.314.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.2% — more favorable54.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.2% — more favorable56.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility34.8%46.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise. This is common on these pages by construction: Plano and Richardson were paired because they are alike, and the more alike two places are, the less a sample of this size can tell them apart.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Plano

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Richardson

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Plano
—
Plano: Your Score
70
Area Score
Richardson
—
Richardson: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Plano, TX · Richardson, TX · How this is calculated: methodology