Pittsburg vs Ironton

Which is the better fit for you?

Pittsburg, KS
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally
Ironton, OH
50
Area Score
Bottom 21% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Pittsburg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pittsburg to Ironton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Pittsburg, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$72 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Ironton against $901 in Pittsburg.
The median home
13% less
$106,700 in Ironton against $123,200 in Pittsburg.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F milder
Normal January lows are 26°F in Ironton against 23°F in Pittsburg; July highs are 86°F against 89°F (summers 3°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pittsburg
Ironton
Opportunity: Ironton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
38 · Bottom 14%
vs
54 · Bottom 45%
Growth: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
50 · Bottom 49%
vs
43 · Bottom 33%
Climate: Ironton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 43%
vs
75 · Top 28%
Physical resilience: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
35 · Bottom 28%
vs
20 · Bottom 14%
Housing affordability: Ironton is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 40%
vs
72 · Top 33%
Schools: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
58 · Top 39%
vs
53 · Top 45%
Access: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
46 · Bottom 3%
Economic stability: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
30 · Bottom 10%
vs
22 · Bottom 4%

Measured values

MetricPittsburgIrontonSource period
Population20,63710,7682024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$43,419 ±$3,038$47,648 ±$4,6112024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$25,856 ±$2,097$27,467 ±$3,1122024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,534/sq mi2,409/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$123,200$106,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$854 ±$39$782 ±$912024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$901 — more favorable$973FY2026
Homeownership rate46.3%59.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5%+0.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher33.2% — more favorable18.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate24.0% ±4%22.9% ±7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)371612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.8 — more favorable1.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+68.2%0.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F86°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.8"45.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport73 mi — more favorable86 miNASR current cycle
Average commute16.9 min — more favorable23.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age25.740.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools692024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.9 — more favorable16.12024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.3%65.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.5%66.6%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kansas and Ohio do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pittsburg

Elevated or high exposure: drought, ice storm, inland flooding.

Ironton

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pittsburg
—
Pittsburg: Your Score
51
Area Score
Ironton
—
Ironton: Your Score
50
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pittsburg, KS · Ironton, OH · How this is calculated: methodology