Pittsburg vs San Francisco

Which is the better fit for you?

Pittsburg, CA
40
Area Score
Bottom 3% nationally
San Francisco, CA
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

San Francisco receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pittsburg to San Francisco

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$692 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Francisco against $2,912 in Pittsburg.
The median home
133% more
$1,394,500 in San Francisco against $597,900 in Pittsburg.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F milder
Normal January lows are 47°F in San Francisco against 41°F in Pittsburg; July highs are 66°F against 88°F (summers 22°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pittsburg
San Francisco
Opportunity: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
34 · Bottom 10%
vs
59 · Top 43%
Growth: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
38 · Bottom 26%
vs
37 · Bottom 24%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
23 · Bottom 17%
vs
45 · Bottom 36%
Housing affordability: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
37 · Bottom 8%
vs
48 · Bottom 19%
Schools: San Francisco is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
5 · Bottom 1%
vs
51 · Top 48%
Access: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Access
89 · Bottom 37%
vs
81 · Bottom 23%
Economic stability: Pittsburg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 50%
vs
56 · Bottom 46%

Measured values

MetricPittsburgSan FranciscoSource period
Population76,257830,2352024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$99,861$140,970 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$38,833$92,289 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,314/sq mi17,784/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$597,900$1,394,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,264 — more favorable$2,4762024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,912 — more favorable$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate62.3%38.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%3.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.6%−1.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher23.6%60.3% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.3% ±2%10.6% ±0.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)851,62212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.12.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−13.3%+27.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F66°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation16.1"22.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport27 mi — more favorable37 miNASR current cycle
Average commute41.3 min33.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.640.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools181282024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.821.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency20.9%46.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.6%55.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility80.1%54.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pittsburg

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Francisco

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pittsburg
—
Pittsburg: Your Score
40
Area Score
San Francisco
—
San Francisco: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pittsburg, CA · San Francisco, CA · How this is calculated: methodology