Pearl vs Alcoa

Which is the better fit for you?

Pearl, MS
67
Area Score
Top 21% nationally
Alcoa, TN
71
Area Score
Top 12% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Alcoa receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pearl to Alcoa

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
3% higher
Regional price level 92.2 against 89.8 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$109 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,459 in Alcoa against $1,350 in Pearl.
The median home
52% more
$277,100 in Alcoa against $182,500 in Pearl.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F colder
Normal January lows are 30°F in Alcoa against 37°F in Pearl; July highs are 88°F against 92°F (summers 4°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

31 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Pearl
Alcoa
Opportunity: Alcoa is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
69 · Top 26%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth: Alcoa is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
76 · Top 8%
vs
91 · Top 1%
Climate: Alcoa is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
76 · Top 25%
vs
77 · Top 23%
Physical resilience: Alcoa is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
51 · Bottom 45%
vs
61 · Top 47%
Housing affordability
66 · Bottom 49%
vs
66 · Bottom 49%
Schools: Pearl is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
63 · Top 32%
vs
58 · Top 40%
Access: Alcoa is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 42%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Pearl is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricPearlAlcoaSource period
Population27,73712,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$61,695 ±$8,495$65,714 ±$5,9052024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$35,473 ±$2,361$40,886 ±$5,9502024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,088/sq mi821/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$182,500$277,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,175 ±$60$1,282 ±$1172024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,350 — more favorable$1,459FY2026
Cost of living index89.8 — more favorable92.22023
Homeownership rate61.6%66.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.6% — more favorable3.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.2%−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate28.1% ±4%34.1% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.1% ±3%11.5% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)14325812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents5.221.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+30.0%+177.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F88°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation57.3"51.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi1 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.2 min ±2.7 min26.2 min ±2.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.435.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools542024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.7%38.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency51.2%43.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Mississippi and Tennessee do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pearl

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Alcoa

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, lightning, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pearl
—
Pearl: Your Score
67
Area Score
Alcoa
—
Alcoa: Your Score
71
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pearl, MS · Alcoa, TN · How this is calculated: methodology