Pasadena vs Sugar Land

Which is the better fit for you?

Pasadena, TX
48
Area Score
Bottom 15% nationally
Sugar Land, TX
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Sugar Land receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pasadena to Sugar Land

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 99.7 against 99.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$859 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,228 in Sugar Land against $1,369 in Pasadena.
The median home
105% more
$430,200 in Sugar Land against $209,600 in Pasadena.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Sugar Land against 46°F in Pasadena; July highs are 95°F against 93°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pasadena
Sugar Land
Opportunity: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
43 · Bottom 22%
vs
69 · Top 25%
Growth: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
28 · Bottom 12%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 27%
vs
73 · Top 38%
Physical resilience: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 15%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 41%
vs
71 · Top 38%
Schools: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 50%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Access: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
37 · Bottom 17%
vs
68 · Top 29%

Measured values

MetricPasadenaSugar LandSource period
Population149,433110,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$64,927$136,217 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$29,029$62,018 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,420/sq mi2,719/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$209,600$430,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,213 — more favorable$1,9572024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,369 — more favorable$2,228FY2026
Cost of living index99.799.72023
Homeownership rate54.5%80.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.8%4.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.1%+0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher16.2%63.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate18.7%5.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5846612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.44.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−27.5%+796.2%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation55.6"49.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute28.9 min — more favorable31.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.042.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools45362024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.5 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.7%68.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.8%69.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility81.7%41.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pasadena

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, inland flooding.

Sugar Land

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pasadena
—
Pasadena: Your Score
48
Area Score
Sugar Land
—
Sugar Land: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pasadena, TX · Sugar Land, TX · How this is calculated: methodology