Pasadena vs Rosenberg

Which is the better fit for you?

Pasadena, TX
48
Area Score
Bottom 15% nationally
Rosenberg, TX
62
Area Score
Top 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Rosenberg receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pasadena to Rosenberg

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 99.7 against 99.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$194 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,563 in Rosenberg against $1,369 in Pasadena.
The median home
5% more
$219,100 in Rosenberg against $209,600 in Pasadena.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Rosenberg against 46°F in Pasadena; July highs are 95°F against 93°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pasadena
Rosenberg
Opportunity: Rosenberg is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
43 · Bottom 22%
vs
51 · Bottom 38%
Growth: Rosenberg is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
28 · Bottom 12%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 27%
vs
73 · Top 38%
Physical resilience: Rosenberg is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 15%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Pasadena is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 41%
vs
68 · Top 45%
Schools: Rosenberg is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 50%
vs
67 · Top 28%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 23%
Economic stability: Rosenberg is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
37 · Bottom 17%
vs
41 · Bottom 23%

Measured values

MetricPasadenaRosenbergSource period
Population149,43340,6462024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$64,927 ±$3,020$65,668 ±$6,5902024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$29,029 ±$1,240$28,680 ±$1,9592024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,420/sq mi1,080/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$209,600$219,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,213 — more favorable$1,3792024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,369 — more favorable$1,563FY2026
Cost of living index99.799.72023
Homeownership rate54.5%54.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.8%5.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.1%+0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate16.2% ±1%20.3% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.7% ±2%19.1% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5832012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.47.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−27.5%−10.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation55.6"49.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport3 mi — more favorable11 miNASR current cycle
Average commute28.9 min — more favorable31.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.032.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools45312024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.5 — more favorable17.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.7%60.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.8%52.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility81.7%54.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pasadena

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, inland flooding.

Rosenberg

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pasadena
—
Pasadena: Your Score
48
Area Score
Rosenberg
—
Rosenberg: Your Score
62
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pasadena, TX · Rosenberg, TX · How this is calculated: methodology