Pasadena Hills vs Graham

Which is the better fit for you?

Pasadena Hills, FL
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally
Graham, WA
56
Area Score
Bottom 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Pasadena Hills and Graham receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pasadena Hills to Graham

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
10% higher
Regional price level 112.7 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$231 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,971 in Graham against $2,202 in Pasadena Hills.
The median home
52% more
$516,700 in Graham against $338,900 in Pasadena Hills.
The weather you would swap
Winters 8°F colder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Graham against 44°F in Pasadena Hills; July highs are 76°F against 91°F (summers 15°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

31 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Pasadena Hills
Graham
Opportunity: Pasadena Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
48 · Bottom 33%
vs
47 · Bottom 30%
Growth: Graham is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
73 · Top 12%
vs
74 · Top 10%
Climate: Pasadena Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
86 · Top 9%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: Graham is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
19 · Bottom 12%
vs
32 · Bottom 25%
Housing affordability: Pasadena Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 22%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: Graham is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
40 · Bottom 37%
vs
41 · Bottom 39%
Access: Pasadena Hills is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 44%
vs
83 · Bottom 25%
Economic stability: Graham is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
62 · Top 43%
vs
64 · Top 37%

Measured values

MetricPasadena HillsGrahamSource period
Population13,50535,0792024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$84,821$116,862 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,122 ±$3,428$41,701 ±$2,5672024 ACS 5-Year
Population density452/sq mi822/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$338,900$516,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,167 — more favorable$2,0952024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,202$1,971 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5 — more favorable112.72023
Homeownership rate87.9%82.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.2% — more favorable5.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.0% — more favorable−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher32.1% — more favorable23.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.6% ±2%5.9% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)8,2615,85812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents13.5 — more favorable6.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+18.6%+70.7% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F76°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low44°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation51.9"42.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport24 mi — more favorable29 miNASR current cycle
Average commute36.8 min — more favorable44.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.135.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1692024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.4 — more favorable18.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency57.3%48.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency54.7%65.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility36.6%51.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Florida and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pasadena Hills

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Graham

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pasadena Hills
—
Pasadena Hills: Your Score
56
Area Score
Graham
—
Graham: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pasadena Hills, FL · Graham, WA · How this is calculated: methodology