Pacifica vs San Mateo

Which is the better fit for you?

Pacifica, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
San Mateo, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Pacifica and San Mateo receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pacifica to San Mateo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Mateo against $3,604 in Pacifica.
The median home
30% more
$1,618,700 in San Mateo against $1,249,800 in Pacifica.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 45°F in San Mateo against 45°F in Pacifica; July highs are 73°F against 73°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pacifica
San Mateo
Opportunity: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 44%
vs
60 · Top 42%
Growth: San Mateo is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
21 · Bottom 6%
vs
29 · Bottom 13%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience
37 · Bottom 30%
vs
37 · Bottom 30%
Housing affordability: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
38 · Bottom 9%
vs
34 · Bottom 6%
Schools: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
60 · Top 37%
vs
57 · Top 40%
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
99 · Top 9%
Economic stability: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 14%
vs
67 · Top 31%

Measured values

MetricPacificaSan MateoSource period
Population37,261103,1052024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$160,523 ±$13,153$153,504 ±$7,5042024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$73,854$84,247 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,961/sq mi8,497/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,249,800$1,618,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$3,098 ±$184$3,077 ±$1002024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate67.7%49.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7%−1.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.9%57.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate5.6% — more favorable7.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)109812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.31.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−16.7%−34.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F73°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.6"19.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi5 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate29.7 min ±1.1 min28.6 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.638.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9192024-25 school year
Students per teacher21.020.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency51.8% — more favorable48.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency60.7%61.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility18.4%37.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pacifica

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Mateo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pacifica
—
Pacifica: Your Score
54
Area Score
San Mateo
—
San Mateo: Your Score
54
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pacifica, CA · San Mateo, CA · How this is calculated: methodology