Pacifica vs San Anselmo

Which is the better fit for you?

Pacifica, CA
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
San Anselmo, CA
51
Area Score
Bottom 23% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Pacifica receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Pacifica to San Anselmo

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 117.6 against 117.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $3,604 in San Anselmo against $3,604 in Pacifica.
The median home
26% more
$1,576,700 in San Anselmo against $1,249,800 in Pacifica.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 47°F in San Anselmo against 45°F in Pacifica; July highs are 66°F against 73°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Pacifica
San Anselmo
Opportunity: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
59 · Top 44%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Growth: San Anselmo is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
21 · Bottom 6%
vs
23 · Bottom 7%
Climate
89 · Top 8%
vs
89 · Top 8%
Physical resilience: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
37 · Bottom 30%
vs
33 · Bottom 26%
Housing affordability: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
38 · Bottom 9%
vs
25 · Bottom 2%
Schools: San Anselmo is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
60 · Top 37%
vs
65 · Top 30%
Access: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Pacifica is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
74 · Top 14%
vs
69 · Top 27%

Measured values

MetricPacificaSan AnselmoSource period
Population37,26112,6792024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$160,523 ±$13,153$173,641 ±$17,4642024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$73,854$104,254 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,961/sq mi4,740/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$1,249,800$1,576,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$3,098 ±$184$2,797 ±$3272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$3,604$3,604FY2026
Cost of living index117.6117.62023
Homeownership rate67.7%68.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable4.2%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.7% — more favorable−2.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher48.9%70.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.6% ±1%7.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)101512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.31.2 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−16.7%−31.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high73°F66°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low45°F47°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation19.6"22.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate29.7 min ±1.1 min31.1 min ±3.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.645.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher21.019.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency51.8%54.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency60.7%63.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Pacifica

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

San Anselmo

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, coastal flooding, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Pacifica
—
Pacifica: Your Score
54
Area Score
San Anselmo
—
San Anselmo: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Pacifica, CA · San Anselmo, CA · How this is calculated: methodology