Ozark vs Taylors

Which is the better fit for you?

Ozark, MO
73
Area Score
Top 7% nationally
Taylors, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Taylors receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Ozark to Taylors

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% higher
Regional price level 93.1 against 89.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$244 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,339 in Taylors against $1,095 in Ozark.
The median home
1% more
$257,500 in Taylors against $254,800 in Ozark.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F milder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Taylors against 23°F in Ozark; July highs are 91°F against 88°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Ozark
Taylors
Opportunity: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
79 · Top 9%
vs
85 · Top 3%
Growth: Ozark is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
73 · Top 11%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Ozark is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 40%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
52 · Bottom 45%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Ozark is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 15%
vs
78 · Top 17%
Schools: Ozark is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
79 · Top 12%
Access: Taylors is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 40%
vs
97 · Top 24%
Economic stability: Ozark is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 50%
vs
57 · Bottom 47%

Measured values

MetricOzarkTaylorsSource period
Population22,41724,5052024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$74,182 ±$6,354$77,144 ±$12,4762024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$32,257$36,997 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,845/sq mi2,320/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$254,800$257,5002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,097 — more favorable$1,3372024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,095 — more favorable$1,339FY2026
Cost of living index89.1 — more favorable93.12023
Homeownership rate62.6%74.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.2%+4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher30.7%46.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.4% ±5%10.7% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1804,87312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.08.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−1.6%−10.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.5"47.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport17 mi11 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate24.8 min ±1.4 min23.3 min ±1.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.837.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools892024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.2 — more favorable16.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.0%64.6%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency65.6%69.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Missouri and South Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Ozark

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, tornado, strong wind.

Taylors

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Ozark
—
Ozark: Your Score
73
Area Score
Taylors
—
Taylors: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Ozark, MO · Taylors, SC · How this is calculated: methodology