On Top of the World vs Newport

Which is the better fit for you?

On Top of the World, FL
48
Area Score
Bottom 14% nationally
Newport, OR
45
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

On Top of the World receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from On Top of the World to Newport

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Newport, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$107 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,480 in Newport against $1,373 in On Top of the World.
The median home
45% more
$441,400 in Newport against $303,900 in On Top of the World.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F colder
Normal January lows are 39°F in Newport against 46°F in On Top of the World; July highs are 64°F against 92°F (summers 28°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

On Top of the World
Newport
Opportunity: On Top of the World is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
44 · Bottom 24%
vs
33 · Bottom 9%
Growth: Newport is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
69 · Top 16%
vs
73 · Top 11%
Climate: On Top of the World is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
84 · Top 10%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience
23 · Bottom 18%
vs
23 · Bottom 18%
Housing affordability: On Top of the World is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 25%
vs
52 · Bottom 23%
Schools: Newport is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
19 · Bottom 12%
vs
29 · Bottom 23%
Access: Newport is the more favorable of the two.
Access
63 · Bottom 7%
vs
67 · Bottom 9%
Economic stability: On Top of the World is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
44 · Bottom 27%
vs
33 · Bottom 13%

Measured values

MetricOn Top of the WorldNewportSource period
Population16,00710,5832024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$60,670 ±$5,759$60,568 ±$7,6782024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$46,738 — more favorable$40,0882024 ACS 5-Year
Population density914/sq mi1,061/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$303,900$441,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,212 ±$191$1,241 ±$882024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,373 — more favorable$1,480FY2026
Homeownership rate92.6%58.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.8% — more favorable6.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.8% — more favorable−1.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher38.8% — more favorable31.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate6.9% — more favorable14.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5,64510712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents14.1 — more favorable10.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−11.0%+345.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high92°F64°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low46°F39°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation51.6"67.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport68 mi54 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute24.6 min16.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age71.451.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools142024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.618.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency48.5%34.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency47.4%50.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility44.9%90.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Florida and Oregon do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

On Top of the World

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, wildfire.

Newport

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

On Top of the World
—
On Top of the World: Your Score
48
Area Score
Newport
—
Newport: Your Score
45
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: On Top of the World, FL · Newport, OR · How this is calculated: methodology