North Mankato vs Port Washington

Which is the better fit for you?

North Mankato, MN
73
Area Score
Top 7% nationally
Port Washington, WI
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Port Washington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from North Mankato to Port Washington

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% higher
Regional price level 95.7 against 87.6 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$167 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,338 in Port Washington against $1,171 in North Mankato.
The median home
13% more
$296,300 in Port Washington against $262,100 in North Mankato.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F milder
Normal January lows are 15°F in Port Washington against 6°F in North Mankato; July highs are 79°F against 82°F (summers 3°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

North Mankato
Port Washington
Opportunity: North Mankato is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
80 · Top 7%
vs
74 · Top 17%
Growth: North Mankato is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 33%
vs
51 · Top 48%
Climate: Port Washington is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
53 · Bottom 2%
vs
55 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Port Washington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
73 · Top 32%
vs
97 · Top 2%
Housing affordability: North Mankato is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
89 · Top 2%
vs
79 · Top 15%
Schools
82 · Top 9%
vs
82 · Top 10%
Access: Port Washington is the more favorable of the two.
Access
61 · Bottom 6%
vs
71 · Bottom 12%
Economic stability: North Mankato is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
80 · Top 4%
vs
68 · Top 29%

Measured values

MetricNorth MankatoPort WashingtonSource period
Population14,21112,6452024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$80,791 ±$6,259$81,948 ±$9,9492024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$51,604 ±$9,273$44,834 ±$3,6532024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,208/sq mi2,124/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$262,100$296,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$973 ±$35$1,008 ±$762024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,171 — more favorable$1,338FY2026
Cost of living index87.6 — more favorable95.72023
Homeownership rate69.7%65.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.5%3.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.4% — more favorable+0.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate40.7% ±4%40.1% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.3% ±2%6.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)544112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.8 — more favorable3.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+54.3%−30.5%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F79°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low6°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.9"33.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport63 mi53 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute16.2 min — more favorable22.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.540.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools642024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.213.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency71.7%54.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency68.3%57.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility31.5%26.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Minnesota and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

North Mankato

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind, tornado.

Port Washington

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

North Mankato
—
North Mankato: Your Score
73
Area Score
Port Washington
—
Port Washington: Your Score
74
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: North Mankato, MN · Port Washington, WI · How this is calculated: methodology