Nixa vs Wade Hampton

Which is the better fit for you?

Nixa, MO
74
Area Score
Top 5% nationally
Wade Hampton, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Wade Hampton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Nixa to Wade Hampton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% higher
Regional price level 93.1 against 89.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$244 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,339 in Wade Hampton against $1,095 in Nixa.
The median home
31% more
$339,000 in Wade Hampton against $258,700 in Nixa.
The weather you would swap
Winters 12°F milder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Wade Hampton against 23°F in Nixa; July highs are 91°F against 88°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

29 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Nixa
Wade Hampton
Opportunity: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
81 · Top 6%
vs
84 · Top 3%
Growth: Nixa is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Nixa is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 40%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
50 · Bottom 43%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Nixa is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 13%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: Nixa is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
82 · Top 9%
vs
78 · Top 14%
Access: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 47%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Nixa is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 32%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricNixaWade HamptonSource period
Population24,83620,8982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$83,385 ±$4,260$77,449 ±$5,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$35,877$43,359 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,667/sq mi2,381/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$258,700$339,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,083 ±$52$1,115 ±$622024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,095 — more favorable$1,339FY2026
Cost of living index89.1 — more favorable93.12023
Homeownership rate67.1%64.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.7%3.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.2%+4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher36.7%46.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.3% ±2%6.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2034,87312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.28.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+1.5%−10.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation46.5"47.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport15 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute24.7 min21.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.338.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1152024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.214.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency62.0%65.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency65.0%63.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Missouri and South Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Nixa

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, tornado, strong wind.

Wade Hampton

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Nixa
—
Nixa: Your Score
74
Area Score
Wade Hampton
—
Wade Hampton: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Nixa, MO · Wade Hampton, SC · How this is calculated: methodology