New Haven vs Wallingford Center

Which is the better fit for you?

New Haven, CT
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally
Wallingford Center, CT
53
Area Score
Bottom 31% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Wallingford Center receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from New Haven to Wallingford Center

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 105.4 against 105.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
11% more
$319,200 in Wallingford Center against $287,100 in New Haven.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F colder
Normal January lows are 19°F in Wallingford Center against 23°F in New Haven; July highs are 84°F against 82°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

New Haven
Wallingford Center
Opportunity: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
22 · Bottom 2%
vs
31 · Bottom 7%
Growth: New Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
37 · Bottom 25%
vs
29 · Bottom 14%
Climate: New Haven is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
65 · Bottom 36%
vs
62 · Bottom 22%
Physical resilience
44 · Bottom 35%
vs
44 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
66 · Bottom 49%
vs
84 · Top 6%
Schools: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
28 · Bottom 23%
vs
71 · Top 24%
Access: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Access
77 · Bottom 18%
vs
84 · Bottom 27%
Economic stability: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
73 · Top 18%

Measured values

MetricNew HavenWallingford CenterSource period
Population134,34918,2082024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$56,851$89,959 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,242$49,570 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density7,188/sq mi2,509/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$287,100$319,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,488$1,336 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index105.4105.42023
Homeownership rate28.4%60.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate7.0%5.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.0%−4.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate38.9% ±2%35.8% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate22.7%6.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)27478312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable1.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−21.7%−9.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high82°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation41.8"44.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport45 mi34 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.6 min ±0.8 min26.6 min ±2.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age31.939.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools50122024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.010.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency22.5%42.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency37.5%60.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility71.5%35.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

New Haven

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, coastal flooding.

Wallingford Center

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

New Haven
—
New Haven: Your Score
43
Area Score
Wallingford Center
—
Wallingford Center: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: New Haven, CT · Wallingford Center, CT · How this is calculated: methodology