Neosho vs Spearfish

Which is the better fit for you?

Neosho, MO
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally
Spearfish, SD
58
Area Score
Bottom 46% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Neosho receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Neosho to Spearfish

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Spearfish, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$99 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,046 in Spearfish against $947 in Neosho.
The median home
112% more
$346,200 in Spearfish against $163,400 in Neosho.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F colder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Spearfish against 25°F in Neosho; July highs are 84°F against 90°F (summers 6°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Neosho
Spearfish
Opportunity: Spearfish is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
67 · Top 28%
vs
72 · Top 20%
Growth: Spearfish is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
71 · Top 14%
vs
75 · Top 9%
Climate: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
71 · Top 45%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
35 · Bottom 28%
vs
27 · Bottom 22%
Housing affordability: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
85 · Top 6%
vs
71 · Top 37%
Schools
43 · Bottom 41%
vs
43 · Bottom 41%
Access: Neosho is the more favorable of the two.
Access
78 · Bottom 19%
vs
66 · Bottom 9%
Economic stability: Spearfish is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
38 · Bottom 18%
vs
54 · Bottom 43%

Measured values

MetricNeoshoSpearfishSource period
Population13,22412,9302024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$57,891 ±$5,104$65,688 ±$12,5282024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$26,440$45,171 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density848/sq mi749/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$163,400$346,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$745 — more favorable$9632024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$947 — more favorable$1,046FY2026
Homeownership rate61.5%49.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9%1.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+2.5% — more favorable−0.7%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher21.7%41.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.7% ±4%13.4% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)8917312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.713.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−1.1%+30.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.6"21.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport39 mi — more favorable49 miNASR current cycle
Average commute21.0 min17.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.040.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools12102024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.214.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.4%47.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency50.0%58.1%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility60.1%20.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Missouri and South Dakota do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Neosho

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, inland flooding, cold wave.

Spearfish

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, hail, strong wind.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Neosho
—
Neosho: Your Score
61
Area Score
Spearfish
—
Spearfish: Your Score
58
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Neosho, MO · Spearfish, SD · How this is calculated: methodology