Naugatuck vs Wallingford Center

Which is the better fit for you?

Naugatuck, CT
52
Area Score
Bottom 26% nationally
Wallingford Center, CT
53
Area Score
Bottom 31% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Wallingford Center receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Naugatuck to Wallingford Center

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% higher
Regional price level 105.4 against 101.0 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
23% more
$319,200 in Wallingford Center against $259,100 in Naugatuck.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 19°F in Wallingford Center against 19°F in Naugatuck; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

37 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Naugatuck
Wallingford Center
Opportunity: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
30 · Bottom 6%
vs
31 · Bottom 7%
Growth: Naugatuck is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
37 · Bottom 24%
vs
29 · Bottom 14%
Climate
62 · Bottom 22%
vs
62 · Bottom 22%
Physical resilience: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
38 · Bottom 30%
vs
44 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 16%
vs
84 · Top 6%
Schools: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
69 · Top 25%
vs
71 · Top 24%
Access: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Access
83 · Bottom 25%
vs
84 · Bottom 27%
Economic stability: Wallingford Center is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
72 · Top 20%
vs
73 · Top 18%

Measured values

MetricNaugatuckWallingford CenterSource period
Population31,80018,2082024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$96,324 ±$9,473$89,959 ±$7,9612024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$44,375 ±$2,839$49,570 ±$5,0382024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,941/sq mi2,509/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$259,100$319,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,369 ±$58$1,336 ±$1022024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index101.0 — more favorable105.42023
Homeownership rate67.8%60.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate6.0%5.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−4.2%−4.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate32.2% ±4%35.8% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.6% ±2%6.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2278312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.71.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+4.8%−9.4%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F19°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation44.9"44.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport36 mi34 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute33.4 min26.6 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.839.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools12122024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.010.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency50.0% — more favorable42.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency58.1%60.4% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility47.3%35.2%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Naugatuck

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, hurricane.

Wallingford Center

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Naugatuck
—
Naugatuck: Your Score
52
Area Score
Wallingford Center
—
Wallingford Center: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Naugatuck, CT · Wallingford Center, CT · How this is calculated: methodology