Mountain Park vs Peachtree Corners

Which is the better fit for you?

Mountain Park, GA
69
Area Score
Top 16% nationally
Peachtree Corners, GA
67
Area Score
Top 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Mountain Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Mountain Park to Peachtree Corners

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 100.5 against 100.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$22 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,961 in Peachtree Corners against $1,984 in Mountain Park.
The median home
38% more
$484,700 in Peachtree Corners against $350,300 in Mountain Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 33°F in Peachtree Corners against 33°F in Mountain Park; July highs are 89°F against 89°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Mountain Park
Peachtree Corners
Opportunity: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
84 · Top 3%
vs
83 · Top 4%
Growth: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 44%
vs
39 · Bottom 27%
Climate
78 · Top 21%
vs
78 · Top 21%
Physical resilience: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
65 · Top 43%
vs
63 · Top 45%
Housing affordability: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
60 · Bottom 36%
vs
54 · Bottom 27%
Schools: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
73 · Top 20%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Access: Mountain Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
83 · Bottom 25%
vs
81 · Bottom 22%
Economic stability: Peachtree Corners is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
53 · Bottom 42%
vs
69 · Top 27%

Measured values

MetricMountain ParkPeachtree CornersSource period
Population12,85042,3732024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$96,166 — more favorable$82,1392024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$38,385$53,804 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,219/sq mi2,630/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$350,300$484,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,818$1,701 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,984$1,961 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index100.5100.52023
Homeownership rate80.5%53.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.0%2.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.8%+0.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher45.7%51.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.6% ±6%7.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)3,5003512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.6 — more favorable0.812 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−28.1%+2.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low33°F33°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation51.4"51.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport22 mi — more favorable25 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.1 min28.0 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.938.12024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.513.5 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.6% — more favorable47.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency53.8%54.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Mountain Park
—
Mountain Park: Your Score
69
Area Score
Peachtree Corners
—
Peachtree Corners: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Mountain Park, GA · Peachtree Corners, GA · How this is calculated: methodology