Mount Prospect vs Palatine

Which is the better fit for you?

Mount Prospect, IL
62
Area Score
Top 40% nationally
Palatine, IL
59
Area Score
Top 48% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Mount Prospect receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Mount Prospect to Palatine

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$40 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,900 in Palatine against $1,940 in Mount Prospect.
The median home
11% less
$355,600 in Palatine against $397,400 in Mount Prospect.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 18°F in Palatine against 18°F in Mount Prospect; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Mount Prospect
Palatine
Opportunity
53 · Bottom 42%
vs
53 · Bottom 43%
Growth: Mount Prospect is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
26 · Bottom 10%
vs
17 · Bottom 4%
Climate
62 · Bottom 21%
vs
62 · Bottom 21%
Physical resilience: Palatine is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
70 · Top 36%
Housing affordability: Mount Prospect is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
72 · Top 35%
vs
70 · Top 40%
Schools: Mount Prospect is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
77 · Top 16%
vs
67 · Top 27%
Access
97 · Top 31%
vs
97 · Top 25%
Economic stability: Palatine is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
67 · Top 30%
vs
71 · Top 22%

Measured values

MetricMount ProspectPalatineSource period
Population55,47266,2932024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$101,720 ±$5,626$97,819 ±$4,6502024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$48,661 ±$2,289$51,147 ±$2,4552024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,174/sq mi4,696/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$397,400$355,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,502 ±$64$1,549 ±$722024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,940$1,900 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate68.7%67.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.2%−3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate48.6% ±3%51.1% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.8% ±2%8.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+33.3%−33.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F18°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation32.3"32.3"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable12 miNASR current cycle
Average commute28.2 min — more favorable30.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.140.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools15162024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.4 — more favorable14.52024-25 school year
Math proficiency49.3% — more favorable46.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency47.7% — more favorable44.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility49.8%39.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Mount Prospect

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Palatine

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Mount Prospect
—
Mount Prospect: Your Score
62
Area Score
Palatine
—
Palatine: Your Score
59
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Mount Prospect, IL · Palatine, IL · How this is calculated: methodology