Mount Holly vs Gloucester Point

Which is the better fit for you?

Mount Holly, NC
66
Area Score
Top 26% nationally
Gloucester Point, VA
67
Area Score
Top 24% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Gloucester Point receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Mount Holly to Gloucester Point

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 97.7 against 97.3 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$220 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,260 in Gloucester Point against $1,480 in Mount Holly.
The median home
5% less
$320,700 in Gloucester Point against $337,800 in Mount Holly.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F colder
Normal January lows are 31°F in Gloucester Point against 32°F in Mount Holly; July highs are 88°F against 90°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Mount Holly
Gloucester Point
Opportunity: Gloucester Point is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
54 · Bottom 44%
vs
55 · Bottom 47%
Growth: Mount Holly is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
68 · Top 17%
vs
59 · Top 30%
Climate: Gloucester Point is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
72 · Top 39%
vs
78 · Top 21%
Physical resilience: Gloucester Point is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
66 · Top 42%
vs
72 · Top 33%
Housing affordability: Gloucester Point is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
66 · Bottom 48%
vs
76 · Top 23%
Schools: Mount Holly is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
63 · Top 32%
vs
60 · Top 36%
Access: Mount Holly is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Mount Holly is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 33%
vs
49 · Bottom 35%

Measured values

MetricMount HollyGloucester PointSource period
Population18,20811,1092024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$79,385 ±$5,630$74,001 ±$13,2562024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,722 — more favorable$36,1802024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,616/sq mi1,182/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$337,800$320,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,256$1,062 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,480$1,260 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index97.3 — more favorable97.72023
Homeownership rate68.8%67.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8%3.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.8%−1.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher36.7% — more favorable23.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.9% ±3%7.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2,34916512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents10.0 — more favorable4.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+2.8%+57.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F88°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low32°F31°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.6"45.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport8 mi — more favorable10 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.2 min — more favorable36.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.041.42024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools522024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.213.7 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency47.8%87.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency55.0%76.3%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility69.5%66.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

North Carolina and Virginia do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Mount Holly

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm.

Gloucester Point

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, drought, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Mount Holly
—
Mount Holly: Your Score
66
Area Score
Gloucester Point
—
Gloucester Point: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Mount Holly, NC · Gloucester Point, VA · How this is calculated: methodology