Mitchell vs Marshfield

Which is the better fit for you?

Mitchell, SD
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally
Marshfield, WI
65
Area Score
Top 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Marshfield receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Mitchell to Marshfield

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Mitchell or Marshfield, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$37 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Marshfield against $936 in Mitchell.
The median home
7% less
$177,800 in Marshfield against $192,200 in Mitchell.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 7°F in Marshfield against 9°F in Mitchell; July highs are 80°F against 87°F (summers 7°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Mitchell
Marshfield
Opportunity: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
51 · Bottom 39%
vs
63 · Top 37%
Growth: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
41 · Bottom 30%
vs
44 · Bottom 37%
Climate: Mitchell is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
55 · Bottom 6%
vs
54 · Bottom 3%
Physical resilience: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
86 · Top 5%
Schools: Mitchell is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
79 · Top 13%
vs
67 · Top 27%
Access: Marshfield is the more favorable of the two.
Access
55 · Bottom 5%
vs
63 · Bottom 7%
Economic stability: Mitchell is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
59 · Top 48%
vs
53 · Bottom 40%

Measured values

MetricMitchellMarshfieldSource period
Population15,64918,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$58,620 ±$7,441$58,407 ±$3,1022024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,512 ±$2,753$40,778 ±$2,8232024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,355/sq mi1,355/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$192,200$177,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$851 ±$73$842 ±$732024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$936 — more favorable$973FY2026
Homeownership rate56.6%60.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate1.7% — more favorable3.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.3%+2.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate23.6% ±3%25.6% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.2% ±3%11.5% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)432612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.7 — more favorable1.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−4.4%−10.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F80°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low9°F7°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation21.1"24.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport66 mi66 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate14.5 min ±1.6 min16.1 min ±1.4 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.643.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools982024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.9 — more favorable14.62024-25 school year
Math proficiency55.1%46.7%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.9%52.2%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility39.5%36.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

South Dakota and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Mitchell

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, cold wave.

Marshfield

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Mitchell
—
Mitchell: Your Score
61
Area Score
Marshfield
—
Marshfield: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Mitchell, SD · Marshfield, WI · How this is calculated: methodology