Melbourne vs Port St. John

Which is the better fit for you?

Melbourne, FL
51
Area Score
Bottom 24% nationally
Port St. John, FL
55
Area Score
Bottom 36% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Port St. John receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Melbourne to Port St. John

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 101.3 against 101.3 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$177 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,570 in Port St. John against $1,747 in Melbourne.
The median home
8% less
$281,300 in Port St. John against $306,400 in Melbourne.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F colder
Normal January lows are 50°F in Port St. John against 52°F in Melbourne; July highs are 89°F against 90°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Melbourne
Port St. John
Opportunity: Port St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
40 · Bottom 17%
vs
41 · Bottom 20%
Growth: Melbourne is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
66 · Top 20%
vs
55 · Top 39%
Climate: Port St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
83 · Top 10%
vs
92 · Top 4%
Physical resilience
19 · Bottom 12%
vs
19 · Bottom 12%
Housing affordability: Port St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
55 · Bottom 28%
vs
74 · Top 28%
Schools: Port St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
46 · Bottom 45%
vs
57 · Top 41%
Access: Melbourne is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
87 · Bottom 32%
Economic stability: Port St. John is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
47 · Bottom 30%
vs
54 · Bottom 43%

Measured values

MetricMelbournePort St. JohnSource period
Population86,57625,1202024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$66,991$87,736 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$38,249 ±$1,666$39,413 ±$4,7562024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,959/sq mi2,695/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$306,400$281,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,525 — more favorable$1,7712024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,747$1,570 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index101.3101.32023
Homeownership rate59.7%94.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8% — more favorable4.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.3%−1.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.7% — more favorable20.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate14.7%10.2% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4244,84512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents4.97.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+457.9% — more favorable+5.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low52°F50°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.8"48.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport1 mi — more favorable28 miNASR current cycle
Average commute24.5 min — more favorable29.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.544.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1672024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.116.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.6%62.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency59.3% — more favorable57.5%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility44.3%47.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Melbourne

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Port St. John

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Melbourne
—
Melbourne: Your Score
51
Area Score
Port St. John
—
Port St. John: Your Score
55
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Melbourne, FL · Port St. John, FL · How this is calculated: methodology