McPherson vs Harker Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

McPherson, KS
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally
Harker Heights, TX
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

McPherson and Harker Heights receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from McPherson to Harker Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for McPherson, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$313 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,233 in Harker Heights against $920 in McPherson.
The median home
36% more
$287,800 in Harker Heights against $211,700 in McPherson.
The weather you would swap
Winters 16°F milder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Harker Heights against 20°F in McPherson; July highs are 96°F against 93°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

McPherson
Harker Heights
Opportunity: McPherson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
57 · Top 49%
vs
54 · Bottom 45%
Growth
41 · Bottom 31%
vs
41 · Bottom 30%
Climate: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
61 · Bottom 17%
vs
68 · Bottom 42%
Physical resilience: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
75 · Top 31%
vs
79 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: McPherson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
80 · Top 12%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: McPherson is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
51 · Top 48%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access
68 · Bottom 10%
vs
68 · Bottom 10%
Economic stability: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
55 · Bottom 44%
vs
58 · Top 50%

Measured values

MetricMcPhersonHarker HeightsSource period
Population13,99534,1282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$77,529 ±$9,882$81,190 ±$10,8652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$36,077 ±$2,701$38,042 ±$2,9902024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,709/sq mi2,184/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$211,700$287,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$925 — more favorable$1,1462024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$920 — more favorable$1,233FY2026
Homeownership rate65.4%61.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable5.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%−0.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher38.4% — more favorable30.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.7% ±4%10.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)394412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.8 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−25.0%−62.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high93°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation28.3"34.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport51 mi — more favorable52 miNASR current cycle
Average commute12.7 min — more favorable26.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age35.433.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools672024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.0 — more favorable16.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency27.4%48.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency31.1%50.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility47.2%50.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kansas and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

McPherson

Elevated or high exposure: hail, heat wave.

Harker Heights

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

McPherson
—
McPherson: Your Score
61
Area Score
Harker Heights
—
Harker Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: McPherson, KS · Harker Heights, TX · How this is calculated: methodology