McHenry vs Leominster

Which is the better fit for you?

McHenry, IL
61
Area Score
Top 43% nationally
Leominster, MA
62
Area Score
Top 39% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Leominster receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from McHenry to Leominster

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 103.0 against 102.5 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
43% more
$380,400 in Leominster against $266,500 in McHenry.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 16°F in Leominster against 16°F in McHenry; July highs are 83°F against 81°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

31 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

McHenry
Leominster
Opportunity: Leominster is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 35%
vs
52 · Bottom 40%
Growth: Leominster is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
43 · Bottom 33%
vs
48 · Bottom 45%
Climate
60 · Bottom 15%
vs
60 · Bottom 14%
Physical resilience: Leominster is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
74 · Top 32%
vs
85 · Top 16%
Housing affordability: McHenry is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
72 · Top 35%
vs
70 · Top 41%
Schools: McHenry is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
56 · Top 42%
vs
47 · Bottom 47%
Access: Leominster is the more favorable of the two.
Access
83 · Bottom 25%
vs
85 · Bottom 28%
Economic stability: McHenry is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 3%
vs
63 · Top 40%

Measured values

MetricMcHenryLeominsterSource period
Population28,07443,9092024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$86,315 ±$6,312$83,816 ±$6,9392024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$45,734 ±$2,513$47,179 ±$3,0652024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,893/sq mi1,523/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$266,500$380,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,553$1,354 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index102.5 — more favorable103.02023
Homeownership rate74.4%62.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2% — more favorable5.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1%−1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher25.7%33.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.4% — more favorable9.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)792512 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.8 — more favorable0.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−68.4%+177.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high81°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation35.3"43.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport32 mi — more favorable33 miNASR current cycle
Average commute31.0 min28.0 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age43.943.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools9122024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.3 — more favorable13.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency30.7%50.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency41.9%45.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Illinois and Massachusetts do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

McHenry

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Leominster

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

McHenry
—
McHenry: Your Score
61
Area Score
Leominster
—
Leominster: Your Score
62
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: McHenry, IL · Leominster, MA · How this is calculated: methodology