McFarland vs Oildale

Which is the better fit for you?

McFarland, CA
40
Area Score
Bottom 3% nationally
Oildale, CA
40
Area Score
Bottom 3% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

McFarland and Oildale receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from McFarland to Oildale

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.4 against 102.4 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,483 in Oildale against $1,483 in McFarland.
The median home
12% less
$238,800 in Oildale against $272,700 in McFarland.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 41°F in Oildale against 41°F in McFarland; July highs are 98°F against 98°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

McFarland
Oildale
Opportunity: Oildale is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
26 · Bottom 4%
vs
27 · Bottom 5%
Growth: McFarland is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
77 · Top 7%
vs
63 · Top 24%
Climate
69 · Bottom 44%
vs
69 · Bottom 44%
Physical resilience
15 · Bottom 10%
vs
15 · Bottom 10%
Housing affordability: Oildale is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
48 · Bottom 18%
vs
55 · Bottom 27%
Schools: Oildale is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
6 · Bottom 1%
vs
9 · Bottom 2%
Access: Oildale is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 46%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: McFarland is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
27 · Bottom 7%

Measured values

MetricMcFarlandOildaleSource period
Population14,22234,6872024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$54,608 ±$7,379$51,298 ±$3,8072024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$17,492$25,014 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,243/sq mi4,386/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$272,700$238,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,131 — more favorable$1,2812024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,483$1,483FY2026
Cost of living index102.4102.42023
Homeownership rate56.9%40.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate8.6%8.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.1%−1.1%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher6.0%12.4% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate23.3% ±6%25.9% ±5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1063,21812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents7.5 — more favorable3.512 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+307.7%+5.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high98°F98°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low41°F41°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation6.4"6.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.3 min ±3.1 min24.6 min ±1.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age26.335.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools7122024-25 school year
Students per teacher24.321.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency24.4% — more favorable22.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.7%39.0% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility85.3%84.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

McFarland

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

Oildale

Elevated or high exposure: wildfire, heat wave, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

McFarland
—
McFarland: Your Score
40
Area Score
Oildale
—
Oildale: Your Score
40
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: McFarland, CA · Oildale, CA · How this is calculated: methodology