McDonough vs Oak Harbor

Which is the better fit for you?

McDonough, GA
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Oak Harbor, WA
62
Area Score
Top 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

McDonough receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from McDonough to Oak Harbor

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Oak Harbor, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$409 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,671 in Oak Harbor against $2,080 in McDonough.
The median home
47% more
$461,200 in Oak Harbor against $314,600 in McDonough.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 38°F in Oak Harbor against 36°F in McDonough; July highs are 69°F against 90°F (summers 21°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

McDonough
Oak Harbor
Opportunity: Oak Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
69 · Top 25%
vs
77 · Top 13%
Growth: Oak Harbor is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
54 · Top 42%
vs
61 · Top 27%
Climate: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
75 · Top 29%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
76 · Top 29%
vs
60 · Top 48%
Housing affordability: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
55 · Bottom 28%
vs
51 · Bottom 21%
Schools: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 42%
vs
39 · Bottom 35%
Access: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Access
84 · Bottom 26%
vs
66 · Bottom 9%
Economic stability: McDonough is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 50%
vs
52 · Bottom 39%

Measured values

MetricMcDonoughOak HarborSource period
Population30,94724,3622024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$75,343 ±$9,372$76,084 ±$2,8032024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$33,041$36,377 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,313/sq mi2,521/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$314,600$461,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,792$1,645 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,080$1,671 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate54.8%46.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.0%3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.0%+2.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate28.5% ±4%28.9% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.0% ±4%8.4% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)11611912 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.74.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−47.5%+5.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F69°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low36°F38°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation50.4"19.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport21 mi — more favorable55 miNASR current cycle
Average commute35.7 min20.2 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age33.231.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools19122024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.616.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency37.6%48.0%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency43.0%62.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility57.8%43.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Georgia and Washington do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

McDonough

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Oak Harbor

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, coastal flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

McDonough
—
McDonough: Your Score
64
Area Score
Oak Harbor
—
Oak Harbor: Your Score
62
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: McDonough, GA · Oak Harbor, WA · How this is calculated: methodology