Madison Heights vs Reading

Which is the better fit for you?

Madison Heights, MI
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally
Reading, OH
64
Area Score
Top 33% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Reading receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Madison Heights to Reading

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
4% lower
Regional price level 94.2 against 98.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$220 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,160 in Reading against $1,380 in Madison Heights.
The median home
6% more
$211,300 in Reading against $199,100 in Madison Heights.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 24°F in Reading against 20°F in Madison Heights; July highs are 87°F against 84°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

34 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Madison Heights
Reading
Opportunity: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
64 · Top 35%
vs
66 · Top 31%
Growth: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
17 · Bottom 4%
vs
26 · Bottom 10%
Climate: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 28%
vs
69 · Bottom 46%
Physical resilience: Madison Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 5%
vs
89 · Top 12%
Housing affordability: Madison Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 15%
vs
77 · Top 20%
Schools: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
30 · Bottom 25%
vs
37 · Bottom 33%
Access: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 41%
vs
94 · Top 43%
Economic stability: Reading is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
56 · Bottom 46%
vs
59 · Top 49%

Measured values

MetricMadison HeightsReadingSource period
Population28,41910,5022024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$69,503 — more favorable$61,8662024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$42,044 — more favorable$36,4322024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,011/sq mi3,635/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$199,100$211,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,176$940 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,380$1,160 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.294.2 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate64.8%58.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.8% — more favorable3.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.5%+0.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher33.9% — more favorable24.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate10.1% ±2%11.6% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.10.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−42.9%−66.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F24°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.9"43.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport24 mi17 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.4 min19.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.045.32024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.1 — more favorable17.42024-25 school year
Math proficiency26.8%57.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency38.3%62.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Michigan and Ohio do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Madison Heights

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Reading

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Madison Heights
—
Madison Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score
Reading
—
Reading: Your Score
64
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Madison Heights, MI · Reading, OH · How this is calculated: methodology