Macomb vs Cambridge

Which is the better fit for you?

Macomb, IL
53
Area Score
Bottom 30% nationally
Cambridge, OH
51
Area Score
Bottom 22% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Macomb receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Macomb to Cambridge

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Macomb or Cambridge, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$22 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $973 in Cambridge against $951 in Macomb.
The median home
18% more
$121,900 in Cambridge against $103,300 in Macomb.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Cambridge against 16°F in Macomb; July highs are 85°F against 86°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Macomb
Cambridge
Opportunity: Macomb is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
44 · Bottom 24%
vs
38 · Bottom 15%
Growth: Macomb is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
20 · Bottom 5%
vs
12 · Bottom 1%
Climate: Cambridge is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
60 · Bottom 15%
vs
64 · Bottom 32%
Physical resilience: Cambridge is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
73 · Top 32%
vs
78 · Top 27%
Housing affordability
73 · Top 32%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: Macomb is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
46 · Bottom 45%
vs
38 · Bottom 35%
Access: Macomb is the more favorable of the two.
Access
70 · Bottom 12%
vs
66 · Bottom 9%
Economic stability: Macomb is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
34 · Bottom 14%
vs
29 · Bottom 8%

Measured values

MetricMacombCambridgeSource period
Population14,89410,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$44,411 ±$4,595$42,946 ±$5,6542024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$28,907 ±$3,176$27,956 ±$3,0842024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,395/sq mi1,580/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$103,300$121,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$765 ±$44$788 ±$1032024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$951 — more favorable$973FY2026
Homeownership rate49.4%48.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%4.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.3% — more favorable−1.6%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher35.4% — more favorable15.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate18.6% ±5%26.0% ±6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.1 — more favorable0.012 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)0.0%−100.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low16°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation38.5"38.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport54 mi — more favorable62 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate17.2 min ±1.9 min21.1 min ±3.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age27.642.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1052024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.6 — more favorable15.12024-25 school year
Math proficiency29.3%54.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency33.7%59.8%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Illinois and Ohio do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Macomb

Elevated or high exposure: hail, cold wave, strong wind.

Cambridge

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Macomb
—
Macomb: Your Score
53
Area Score
Cambridge
—
Cambridge: Your Score
51
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Macomb, IL · Cambridge, OH · How this is calculated: methodology