Mack vs Fate

Which is the better fit for you?

Mack, OH
76
Area Score
Top 3% nationally
Fate, TX
73
Area Score
Top 6% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Mack receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Mack to Fate

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% higher
Regional price level 102.5 against 94.2 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$804 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,174 in Fate against $1,370 in Mack.
The median home
22% more
$384,300 in Fate against $314,400 in Mack.
The weather you would swap
Winters 13°F milder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Fate against 23°F in Mack; July highs are 96°F against 86°F (summers 10°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

35 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Mack
Fate
Opportunity: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
78 · Top 10%
vs
77 · Top 13%
Growth: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
63 · Top 24%
vs
62 · Top 26%
Climate: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
69 · Bottom 45%
vs
68 · Bottom 42%
Physical resilience: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
89 · Top 12%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Fate is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
71 · Top 36%
Schools
70 · Top 25%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Access: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
93 · Top 48%
Economic stability: Mack is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
84 · Top 1%
vs
76 · Top 9%

Measured values

MetricMackFateSource period
Population11,51622,8842024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$121,609 ±$16,722$132,752 ±$10,2392024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$49,004 — more favorable$41,8042024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,293/sq mi1,880/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$314,400$384,3002024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,370 — more favorable$2,174FY2026
Cost of living index94.2 — more favorable102.52023
Homeownership rate94.4%91.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.6% — more favorable4.0%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.6% — more favorable−0.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate39.8% ±6%42.3% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate5.1% ±3%3.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,89515812 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.36.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+110.8%−60.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high86°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low23°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.3"38.4"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable20 miNASR current cycle
Average commute27.6 min — more favorable38.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age45.831.62024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools732024-25 school year
Students per teacher22.016.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency75.9%64.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency79.4%48.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility39.8%31.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Ohio and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Mack

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Fate

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Mack
—
Mack: Your Score
76
Area Score
Fate
—
Fate: Your Score
73
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Mack, OH · Fate, TX · How this is calculated: methodology