Loves Park vs Machesney Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Loves Park, IL
56
Area Score
Bottom 39% nationally
Machesney Park, IL
57
Area Score
Bottom 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Machesney Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Loves Park to Machesney Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 90.2 against 90.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,175 in Machesney Park against $1,175 in Loves Park.
The median home
8% more
$173,700 in Machesney Park against $160,400 in Loves Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 15°F in Machesney Park against 15°F in Loves Park; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Loves Park
Machesney Park
Opportunity: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
49 · Bottom 34%
vs
50 · Bottom 38%
Growth: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
49 · Bottom 48%
Climate
59 · Bottom 12%
vs
59 · Bottom 12%
Physical resilience: Loves Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
63 · Top 45%
vs
62 · Top 46%
Housing affordability: Loves Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 11%
vs
78 · Top 17%
Schools: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
33 · Bottom 29%
vs
43 · Bottom 41%
Access: Machesney Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
68 · Bottom 10%
vs
69 · Bottom 11%
Economic stability: Loves Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
59 · Top 49%
vs
51 · Bottom 38%

Measured values

MetricLoves ParkMachesney ParkSource period
Population23,50222,6302024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$61,868$75,489 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$37,338 ±$2,814$36,950 ±$3,2912024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,440/sq mi1,784/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$160,400$173,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,120 ±$41$1,102 ±$592024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,175$1,175FY2026
Cost of living index90.290.22023
Homeownership rate60.9%79.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.4%4.4%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)0.0%0.0%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher25.7% — more favorable19.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate12.6% ±3%12.7% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)472412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable1.112 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−2.1%+100.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low15°F15°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.2"37.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport58 mi56 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate22.8 min ±1.7 min23.1 min ±1.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.240.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools792024-25 school year
Students per teacher13.4 — more favorable14.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency21.8%29.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency28.0%31.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility62.4%58.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Loves Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Machesney Park

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Loves Park
—
Loves Park: Your Score
56
Area Score
Machesney Park
—
Machesney Park: Your Score
57
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Loves Park, IL · Machesney Park, IL · How this is calculated: methodology