Lexington Park vs Harker Heights

Which is the better fit for you?

Lexington Park, MD
64
Area Score
Top 33% nationally
Harker Heights, TX
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lexington Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lexington Park to Harker Heights

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
10% lower
Regional price level 92.3 against 102.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$600 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,233 in Harker Heights against $1,833 in Lexington Park.
The median home
7% less
$287,800 in Harker Heights against $309,700 in Lexington Park.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F milder
Normal January lows are 36°F in Harker Heights against 30°F in Lexington Park; July highs are 96°F against 87°F (summers 9°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

25 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lexington Park
Harker Heights
Opportunity: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 41%
vs
54 · Bottom 45%
Growth: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
34 · Bottom 20%
vs
41 · Bottom 30%
Climate: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
77 · Top 22%
vs
68 · Bottom 42%
Physical resilience: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
92 · Top 10%
vs
79 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
70 · Top 40%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: Lexington Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
61 · Top 35%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Access: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Access
64 · Bottom 8%
vs
68 · Bottom 10%
Economic stability: Harker Heights is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
47 · Bottom 30%
vs
58 · Top 50%

Measured values

MetricLexington ParkHarker HeightsSource period
Population13,25234,1282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$94,799 ±$19,042$81,190 ±$10,8652024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$46,816 — more favorable$38,0422024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,185/sq mi2,184/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$309,700$287,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,755$1,146 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,833$1,233 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index102.792.3 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate47.7%61.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable5.1%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.5%−0.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher39.1% — more favorable30.2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate14.2% ±5%10.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)2284412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.0 — more favorable1.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−16.8%−62.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high87°F96°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low30°F36°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.3"34.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport65 mi52 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute21.2 min — more favorable26.1 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age31.533.02024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools672024-25 school year
Students per teacher14.3 — more favorable16.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency41.4%48.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency48.3%50.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility53.4%50.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Maryland and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lexington Park

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane, drought, strong wind.

Harker Heights

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lexington Park
—
Lexington Park: Your Score
64
Area Score
Harker Heights
—
Harker Heights: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lexington Park, MD · Harker Heights, TX · How this is calculated: methodology