Leeds vs Sand Springs

Which is the better fit for you?

Leeds, AL
60
Area Score
Top 46% nationally
Sand Springs, OK
56
Area Score
Bottom 40% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Leeds receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Leeds to Sand Springs

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% lower
Regional price level 89.9 against 91.8 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$25 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,157 in Sand Springs against $1,182 in Leeds.
The median home
12% less
$197,700 in Sand Springs against $224,600 in Leeds.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F colder
Normal January lows are 28°F in Sand Springs against 35°F in Leeds; July highs are 94°F against 91°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

33 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Leeds
Sand Springs
Opportunity: Sand Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
50 · Bottom 38%
vs
51 · Bottom 40%
Growth: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
59 · Top 31%
vs
50 · Top 50%
Climate: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 32%
vs
62 · Bottom 20%
Physical resilience: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
52 · Bottom 45%
vs
49 · Bottom 41%
Housing affordability: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
87 · Top 4%
vs
81 · Top 11%
Schools: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
36 · Bottom 32%
vs
35 · Bottom 30%
Access: Leeds is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 32%
vs
94 · Top 44%
Economic stability: Sand Springs is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
47 · Bottom 31%
vs
53 · Bottom 41%

Measured values

MetricLeedsSand SpringsSource period
Population12,02820,1172024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$69,737 ±$4,662$75,645 ±$5,6752024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$35,318 ±$2,962$35,815 ±$2,2482024 ACS 5-Year
Population density527/sq mi1,015/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$224,600$197,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,058 ±$86$1,002 ±$762024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,182$1,157 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index91.889.9 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate72.0%71.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.8% — more favorable4.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%−1.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate27.7% ±4%27.3% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate13.0% ±3%9.8% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)983212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents8.1 — more favorable1.612 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−26.3%+10.3%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F94°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F28°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.6"42.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport10 mi — more favorable14 miNASR current cycle
Average commute28.6 min22.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age39.337.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4102024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.316.8 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency46.0%31.5%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.1%34.6%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility46.0%68.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

5 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Alabama and Oklahoma do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Leeds

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Sand Springs

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, inland flooding.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Leeds
—
Leeds: Your Score
60
Area Score
Sand Springs
—
Sand Springs: Your Score
56
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Leeds, AL · Sand Springs, OK · How this is calculated: methodology