Lawrence vs Colonial Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Lawrence, IN
61
Area Score
Top 41% nationally
Colonial Park, PA
65
Area Score
Top 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Colonial Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lawrence to Colonial Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% higher
Regional price level 97.0 against 94.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$236 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,560 in Colonial Park against $1,796 in Lawrence.
The median home
About the same
$231,100 in Colonial Park against $230,100 in Lawrence.
The weather you would swap
Winters 4°F milder
Normal January lows are 25°F in Colonial Park against 21°F in Lawrence; July highs are 88°F against 85°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lawrence
Colonial Park
Opportunity: Lawrence is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
71 · Top 22%
vs
70 · Top 24%
Growth: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
41 · Bottom 31%
vs
56 · Top 38%
Climate: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
68 · Bottom 40%
vs
70 · Top 50%
Physical resilience: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
66 · Top 41%
vs
67 · Top 40%
Housing affordability: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 44%
vs
74 · Top 27%
Schools: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
31 · Bottom 26%
vs
36 · Bottom 33%
Access: Colonial Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
93 · Top 47%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Lawrence is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
66 · Top 32%
vs
64 · Top 38%

Measured values

MetricLawrenceColonial ParkSource period
Population49,51718,0322024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$74,022 ±$3,986$73,105 ±$7,4622024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$36,079 ±$1,605$33,312 ±$4,3422024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,457/sq mi3,576/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$230,100$231,1002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,178 — more favorable$1,3922024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,796$1,560 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.7 — more favorable97.02023
Homeownership rate66.1%46.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.3% — more favorable3.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.9%+2.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher35.6% — more favorable24.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate8.5% ±2%9.3% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)5850112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents1.21.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−35.6%+52.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F88°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F25°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation40.7"41.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport19 mi8 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.5 min21.7 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age34.336.52024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools10102024-25 school year
Students per teacher19.214.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency41.7%40.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency39.7%55.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility53.5%73.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Indiana and Pennsylvania do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lawrence

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Colonial Park

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lawrence
—
Lawrence: Your Score
61
Area Score
Colonial Park
—
Colonial Park: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lawrence, IN · Colonial Park, PA · How this is calculated: methodology