Laurel vs Waldorf

Which is the better fit for you?

Laurel, MD
60
Area Score
Top 47% nationally
Waldorf, MD
60
Area Score
Top 46% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Laurel and Waldorf receive effectively the same standardized Area Score. Which fits you better depends on which dimensions you weight — the differences below are where they actually diverge.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Laurel to Waldorf

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 109.5 against 109.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$58 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,311 in Waldorf against $2,253 in Laurel.
The median home
6% more
$407,600 in Waldorf against $385,500 in Laurel.
The weather you would swap
Winters 5°F milder
Normal January lows are 30°F in Waldorf against 25°F in Laurel; July highs are 90°F against 89°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Laurel
Waldorf
Opportunity: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
46 · Bottom 29%
vs
41 · Bottom 20%
Growth: Waldorf is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
30 · Bottom 15%
vs
33 · Bottom 18%
Climate: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
73 · Top 36%
vs
72 · Top 42%
Physical resilience: Waldorf is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
76 · Top 29%
vs
91 · Top 10%
Housing affordability: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 19%
vs
74 · Top 27%
Schools: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
41 · Bottom 39%
vs
39 · Bottom 36%
Access: Laurel is the more favorable of the two.
Access
97 · Top 25%
vs
81 · Bottom 22%
Economic stability: Waldorf is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
69 · Top 26%
vs
72 · Top 19%

Measured values

MetricLaurelWaldorfSource period
Population29,79882,9432024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$100,504$116,089 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$49,886 ±$3,080$48,929 ±$1,7192024 ACS 5-Year
Population density6,261/sq mi2,289/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$385,500$407,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,873 — more favorable$1,9952024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,253 — more favorable$2,311FY2026
Cost of living index109.5109.52023
Homeownership rate44.2%74.9%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.3% — more favorable4.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.6%−3.4% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher47.7% — more favorable34.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate9.6% ±2%7.4% ±1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)6462612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.13.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−23.8%−42.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high89°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low25°F30°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation45.0"41.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi — more favorable37 miNASR current cycle
Average commute34.1 min — more favorable44.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.336.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools5122024-25 school year
Students per teacher16.315.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency25.6% — more favorable24.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.6% — more favorable37.4%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility76.2%56.9%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Laurel

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Waldorf

Elevated or high exposure: drought.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Laurel
—
Laurel: Your Score
60
Area Score
Waldorf
—
Waldorf: Your Score
60
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Laurel, MD · Waldorf, MD · How this is calculated: methodology