Lauderdale Lakes vs Mango

Which is the better fit for you?

Lauderdale Lakes, FL
43
Area Score
Bottom 6% nationally
Mango, FL
49
Area Score
Bottom 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Mango receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lauderdale Lakes to Mango

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% lower
Regional price level 102.5 against 112.1 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$340 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,807 in Mango against $2,147 in Lauderdale Lakes.
The median home
20% more
$256,600 in Mango against $214,100 in Lauderdale Lakes.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F colder
Normal January lows are 53°F in Mango against 59°F in Lauderdale Lakes; July highs are 91°F against 91°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

37 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Lauderdale Lakes
Mango
Opportunity: Mango is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
23 · Bottom 2%
vs
33 · Bottom 9%
Growth: Mango is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
44 · Bottom 37%
vs
52 · Top 46%
Climate
81 · Top 14%
vs
81 · Top 13%
Physical resilience: Mango is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
21 · Bottom 14%
vs
35 · Bottom 28%
Housing affordability: Mango is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
42 · Bottom 12%
vs
56 · Bottom 30%
Schools: Lauderdale Lakes is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
44 · Bottom 43%
vs
33 · Bottom 29%
Access: Lauderdale Lakes is the more favorable of the two.
Access
99 · Top 9%
vs
97 · Top 25%
Economic stability: Lauderdale Lakes is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
46 · Bottom 30%
vs
41 · Bottom 22%

Measured values

MetricLauderdale LakesMangoSource period
Population36,40413,2422024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$50,006 ±$6,521$52,524 ±$6,5522024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$24,541 ±$1,584$25,692 ±$1,9502024 ACS 5-Year
Population density9,890/sq mi2,837/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$214,100$256,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,663$1,277 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,147$1,807 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index112.1102.5 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate47.6%56.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%4.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.5%−1.0% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate15.6% ±2%15.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate22.3%14.8% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)348,21712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.95.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−5.6%+12.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low59°F53°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.5"49.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi — more favorable14 miNASR current cycle
Average commute29.7 min — more favorable34.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.638.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher20.119.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.2% — more favorable54.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency57.6% — more favorable54.3%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lauderdale Lakes

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Mango

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lauderdale Lakes
—
Lauderdale Lakes: Your Score
43
Area Score
Mango
—
Mango: Your Score
49
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lauderdale Lakes, FL · Mango, FL · How this is calculated: methodology