Lantana vs Oakland Park

Which is the better fit for you?

Lantana, FL
42
Area Score
Bottom 5% nationally
Oakland Park, FL
44
Area Score
Bottom 8% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Oakland Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lantana to Oakland Park

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.1 against 112.1 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$108 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,268 in Oakland Park against $2,160 in Lantana.
The median home
3% less
$385,000 in Oakland Park against $396,200 in Lantana.
The weather you would swap
Winters 1°F milder
Normal January lows are 59°F in Oakland Park against 58°F in Lantana; July highs are 91°F against 90°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lantana
Oakland Park
Opportunity: Oakland Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
41 · Bottom 19%
vs
46 · Bottom 29%
Growth: Lantana is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
42 · Bottom 32%
vs
35 · Bottom 21%
Climate: Lantana is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
83 · Top 11%
vs
81 · Top 14%
Physical resilience: Oakland Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
17 · Bottom 11%
vs
21 · Bottom 14%
Housing affordability: Oakland Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
32 · Bottom 4%
vs
47 · Bottom 18%
Schools: Lantana is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
18 · Bottom 10%
vs
15 · Bottom 7%
Access
99 · Top 16%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability
60 · Top 47%
vs
60 · Top 46%

Measured values

MetricLantanaOakland ParkSource period
Population12,25644,6822024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$70,012 ±$13,395$72,708 ±$4,2462024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$42,439 ±$6,530$39,645 ±$3,1842024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,178/sq mi5,958/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$396,200$385,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,758 ±$209$1,804 ±$482024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,160 — more favorable$2,268FY2026
Cost of living index112.1112.12023
Homeownership rate52.9%58.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.8%4.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.2% — more favorable−1.5%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate24.2% ±5%27.8% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate11.3% ±3%12.0% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)73412 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.60.8 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−12.5%−22.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high90°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low58°F59°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation61.7"56.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport7 mi7 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate25.0 min ±2.8 min27.6 min ±1.2 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age44.038.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools882024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.4 — more favorable20.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency44.2%46.1% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.5%48.5% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility59.3%38.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

6 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lantana

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Oakland Park

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lantana
—
Lantana: Your Score
42
Area Score
Oakland Park
—
Oakland Park: Your Score
44
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lantana, FL · Oakland Park, FL · How this is calculated: methodology