Lansing vs Kansas City

Which is the better fit for you?

Lansing, KS
62
Area Score
Top 39% nationally
Kansas City, MO
67
Area Score
Top 24% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Kansas City receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lansing to Kansas City

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 93.2 against 93.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$345 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,445 in Kansas City against $1,100 in Lansing.
The median home
10% less
$242,900 in Kansas City against $270,800 in Lansing.
The weather you would swap
Winters 2°F milder
Normal January lows are 22°F in Kansas City against 20°F in Lansing; July highs are 90°F against 88°F (summers 2°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lansing
Kansas City
Opportunity: Kansas City is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
52 · Bottom 42%
vs
73 · Top 19%
Growth: Kansas City is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
24 · Bottom 8%
vs
67 · Top 19%
Climate
66 · Bottom 37%
vs
66 · Bottom 36%
Physical resilience: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
77 · Top 28%
vs
75 · Top 31%
Housing affordability: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
76 · Top 21%
vs
73 · Top 32%
Schools: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
65 · Top 30%
vs
34 · Bottom 30%
Access: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 32%
vs
94 · Top 45%
Economic stability: Lansing is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
58 · Top 49%
vs
49 · Bottom 34%

Measured values

MetricLansingKansas CitySource period
Population11,246510,6122024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$102,786 — more favorable$69,1662024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$36,523$41,393 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density914/sq mi1,623/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$270,800$242,9002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,406 ±$462$1,238 ±$152024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,100 — more favorable$1,445FY2026
Cost of living index93.293.22023
Homeownership rate78.7%55.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.6%3.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−2.2%+0.7% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate36.3% ±5%38.4% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.6% — more favorable13.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)22,34112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.24.6 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−60.0%+8.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high88°F90°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F22°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation39.3"38.1"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport11 mi — more favorable15 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate23.5 min ±2.2 min23.3 min ±0.3 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.835.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools31812024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.413.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency39.1%36.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency42.2%42.9%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility40.7%66.4%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Kansas and Missouri do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lansing

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, hail.

Kansas City

Elevated or high exposure: hail.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lansing
—
Lansing: Your Score
62
Area Score
Kansas City
—
Kansas City: Your Score
67
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lansing, KS · Kansas City, MO · How this is calculated: methodology