Lake Hopatcong vs Newark

Which is the better fit for you?

Lake Hopatcong, NJ
70
Area Score
Top 15% nationally
Newark, NJ
53
Area Score
Bottom 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake Hopatcong receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lake Hopatcong to Newark

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,205 in Newark against $2,205 in Lake Hopatcong.
The median home
12% less
$373,700 in Newark against $424,200 in Lake Hopatcong.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F milder
Normal January lows are 26°F in Newark against 19°F in Lake Hopatcong; July highs are 87°F against 84°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lake Hopatcong
Newark
Opportunity: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
77 · Top 13%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
71 · Top 48%
Physical resilience: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Top 50%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 15%
vs
53 · Bottom 24%
Schools: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Access
86 · Bottom 30%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 4%
vs
33 · Bottom 13%

Measured values

MetricLake HopatcongNewarkSource period
Population10,259310,1782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$117,625 — more favorable$52,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$57,717 — more favorable$27,1932024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,389/sq mi12,847/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$424,200$373,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,686$1,392 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,205$2,205FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate91.7%24.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable6.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.8%+1.8%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.4% — more favorable19.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.9% — more favorable23.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,4662,47212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.88.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.0%−4.7% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.8"46.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport30 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate35.1 min ±2.6 min35.3 min ±0.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age46.034.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1832024-25 school year
Students per teacher10.6 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.5% — more favorable32.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency72.8% — more favorable43.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility15.5%81.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lake Hopatcong

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

Newark

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lake Hopatcong
—
Lake Hopatcong: Your Score
70
Area Score
Newark
—
Newark: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lake Hopatcong, NJ · Newark, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology