Lake Hopatcong vs New York

Which is the better fit for you?

Lake Hopatcong, NJ
70
Area Score
Top 15% nationally
New York, NY
61
Area Score
Top 43% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Lake Hopatcong receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lake Hopatcong to New York

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$705 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,910 in New York against $2,205 in Lake Hopatcong.
The median home
83% more
$777,600 in New York against $424,200 in Lake Hopatcong.
The weather you would swap
Winters 9°F milder
Normal January lows are 28°F in New York against 19°F in Lake Hopatcong; July highs are 85°F against 84°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lake Hopatcong
New York
Opportunity: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
77 · Top 13%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth: New York is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
48 · Bottom 45%
vs
60 · Top 29%
Climate: New York is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
72 · Top 39%
Physical resilience: New York is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
57 · Top 50%
vs
75 · Top 30%
Housing affordability: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
79 · Top 15%
vs
40 · Bottom 10%
Schools: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
83 · Top 8%
vs
54 · Top 44%
Access: New York is the more favorable of the two.
Access
86 · Bottom 30%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Lake Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
81 · Top 4%
vs
42 · Bottom 24%

Measured values

MetricLake HopatcongNew YorkSource period
Population10,2598,483,8442024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$117,625 — more favorable$80,4832024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$57,717 — more favorable$51,8442024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,389/sq mi28,236/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$424,200$777,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,686 ±$231$1,821 ±$72024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,205 — more favorable$2,910FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate91.7%32.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.9% — more favorable5.3%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.8% — more favorable−0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher46.4% — more favorable41.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate3.9% — more favorable17.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)1,46628,51312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents2.83.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.0%+54.6% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F85°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F28°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.8"49.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport30 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute35.1 min — more favorable43.8 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age46.038.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools11,8422024-25 school year
Students per teacher10.6 — more favorable11.92024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.5%62.9%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency72.8%64.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility15.5%78.6%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

New Jersey and New York do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lake Hopatcong

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding, earthquake.

New York

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lake Hopatcong
—
Lake Hopatcong: Your Score
70
Area Score
New York
—
New York: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lake Hopatcong, NJ · New York, NY · How this is calculated: methodology