Lake Forest Park vs Seattle

Which is the better fit for you?

Lake Forest Park, WA
53
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally
Seattle, WA
61
Area Score
Top 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Seattle receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Lake Forest Park to Seattle

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.7 against 112.7 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$246 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,726 in Seattle against $2,480 in Lake Forest Park.
The median home
2% less
$938,600 in Seattle against $953,200 in Lake Forest Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 37°F in Seattle against 37°F in Lake Forest Park; July highs are 77°F against 77°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Lake Forest Park
Seattle
Opportunity: Seattle is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
53 · Bottom 43%
vs
56 · Top 50%
Growth: Seattle is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
17 · Bottom 4%
vs
63 · Top 25%
Climate
74 · Top 35%
vs
74 · Top 35%
Physical resilience
41 · Bottom 31%
vs
41 · Bottom 31%
Housing affordability: Seattle is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
53 · Bottom 24%
vs
57 · Bottom 30%
Schools: Seattle is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
60 · Top 36%
vs
72 · Top 22%
Access: Seattle is the more favorable of the two.
Access
91 · Bottom 45%
vs
95 · Top 42%
Economic stability: Lake Forest Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
72 · Top 19%
vs
66 · Top 33%

Measured values

MetricLake Forest ParkSeattleSource period
Population13,335754,1952024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$159,904 — more favorable$123,8602024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$81,118 ±$5,941$86,095 ±$1,1582024 ACS 5-Year
Population density3,792/sq mi8,979/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$953,200$938,6002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$2,333$2,030 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,480 — more favorable$2,726FY2026
Cost of living index112.7112.72023
Homeownership rate80.6%43.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.9%4.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.3%−1.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate66.0% ±5%68.4% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.1% — more favorable8.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)64,82712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.46.4 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−40.0%+25.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high77°F77°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low37°F37°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation37.8"37.8"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport16 mi7 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute31.0 min28.1 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age42.135.62024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher18.316.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency58.7%61.8% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency70.3%72.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Lake Forest Park

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Seattle

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Lake Forest Park
—
Lake Forest Park: Your Score
53
Area Score
Seattle
—
Seattle: Your Score
61
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Lake Forest Park, WA · Seattle, WA · How this is calculated: methodology