La Grange vs Naperville

Which is the better fit for you?

La Grange, IL
57
Area Score
Bottom 44% nationally
Naperville, IL
70
Area Score
Top 13% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Naperville receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from La Grange to Naperville

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 102.5 against 102.5 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$896 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,535 in Naperville against $1,639 in La Grange.
The median home
9% less
$540,200 in Naperville against $594,300 in La Grange.
The weather you would swap
Winters 3°F colder
Normal January lows are 16°F in Naperville against 19°F in La Grange; July highs are 84°F against 85°F (summers 1°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

La Grange
Naperville
Opportunity: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
45 · Bottom 26%
vs
54 · Bottom 46%
Growth: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
23 · Bottom 7%
vs
49 · Bottom 47%
Climate: La Grange is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
63 · Bottom 26%
vs
60 · Bottom 15%
Physical resilience: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
69 · Top 38%
vs
82 · Top 20%
Housing affordability: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
75 · Top 24%
vs
84 · Top 6%
Schools: Naperville is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
52 · Top 46%
vs
91 · Top 2%
Access: La Grange is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 36%
vs
92 · Bottom 47%
Economic stability
75 · Top 12%
vs
75 · Top 13%

Measured values

MetricLa GrangeNapervilleSource period
Population15,998150,6922024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$159,929 ±$16,644$155,105 ±$4,3872024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$79,689 — more favorable$73,7212024 ACS 5-Year
Population density6,336/sq mi3,829/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$594,300$540,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,856 ±$154$1,885 ±$392024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,639 — more favorable$2,535FY2026
Cost of living index102.5102.52023
Homeownership rate81.5%74.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.4%4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.1% — more favorable−3.2%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher67.2%72.5% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.3% ±2%4.3% ±0.8%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)831012 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.52.1 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−20.0%+11.9%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F16°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation34.4"33.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport12 mi — more favorable20 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate31.5 min ±1.9 min32.9 min ±0.7 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age40.740.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher13.5 — more favorable14.22024-25 school year
Math proficiency31.9%64.6% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency34.9%66.9% — more favorable2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

La Grange

Elevated or high exposure: inland flooding.

Naperville

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

La Grange
—
La Grange: Your Score
57
Area Score
Naperville
—
Naperville: Your Score
70
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: La Grange, IL · Naperville, IL · How this is calculated: methodology