Hopatcong vs South Burlington

Which is the better fit for you?

Hopatcong, NJ
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally
South Burlington, VT
68
Area Score
Top 19% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

South Burlington receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hopatcong to South Burlington

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
11% lower
Regional price level 100.8 against 112.6 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
The median home
30% more
$443,400 in South Burlington against $340,700 in Hopatcong.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F colder
Normal January lows are 13°F in South Burlington against 19°F in Hopatcong; July highs are 82°F against 84°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

27 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Hopatcong
South Burlington
Opportunity: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
72 · Top 21%
vs
68 · Top 27%
Growth: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
38 · Bottom 26%
vs
31 · Bottom 16%
Climate: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
58 · Bottom 10%
Physical resilience: South Burlington is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
78 · Top 27%
vs
93 · Top 8%
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
74 · Top 28%
Access: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Access
85 · Bottom 27%
vs
84 · Bottom 26%
Economic stability: South Burlington is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
75 · Top 12%
vs
79 · Top 5%

Measured values

MetricHopatcongSouth BurlingtonSource period
Population14,56520,7562024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$115,758 ±$8,113$106,667 ±$12,7972024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$56,016 ±$5,203$59,566 ±$4,7162024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,338/sq mi1,263/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$340,700$443,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,777 ±$251$1,787 ±$592024 ACS 5-Year
Cost of living index112.6100.8 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate87.1%61.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2%1.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.6% — more favorable−2.3%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.6%67.6% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.4% ±2%5.5% ±3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)132712 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.91.3 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.8%−71.6%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F82°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F13°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.8"37.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport31 mi20 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute39.8 min19.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.038.22024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools452024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.1 — more favorable12.62024-25 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility37.3%29.0%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

New Jersey and Vermont do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hopatcong

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

South Burlington

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake, heat wave.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hopatcong
—
Hopatcong: Your Score
63
Area Score
South Burlington
—
South Burlington: Your Score
68
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hopatcong, NJ · South Burlington, VT · How this is calculated: methodology