Hopatcong vs Newark

Which is the better fit for you?

Hopatcong, NJ
63
Area Score
Top 36% nationally
Newark, NJ
53
Area Score
Bottom 29% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hopatcong receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hopatcong to Newark

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 112.6 against 112.6 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $2,205 in Newark against $2,205 in Hopatcong.
The median home
10% more
$373,700 in Newark against $340,700 in Hopatcong.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F milder
Normal January lows are 26°F in Newark against 19°F in Hopatcong; July highs are 87°F against 84°F (summers 3°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hopatcong
Newark
Opportunity: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
72 · Top 21%
vs
43 · Bottom 23%
Growth: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
38 · Bottom 26%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 23%
vs
71 · Top 48%
Physical resilience: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
78 · Top 27%
vs
50 · Bottom 43%
Housing affordability: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
53 · Bottom 24%
Schools: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
30 · Bottom 25%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Newark is the more favorable of the two.
Access
85 · Bottom 27%
vs
99 · Top 16%
Economic stability: Hopatcong is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
75 · Top 12%
vs
33 · Bottom 13%

Measured values

MetricHopatcongNewarkSource period
Population14,565310,1782024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$115,758 — more favorable$52,0602024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$56,016 — more favorable$27,1932024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,338/sq mi12,847/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$340,700$373,7002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,777$1,392 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$2,205$2,205FY2026
Cost of living index112.6112.62023
Homeownership rate87.1%24.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.2% — more favorable6.9%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+1.6%+1.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher34.6% — more favorable19.7%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.4% — more favorable23.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)132,47212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.98.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−18.8%−4.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F87°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low19°F26°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation48.8"46.6"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport31 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute39.8 min35.3 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.034.72024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools4832024-25 school year
Students per teacher12.1 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency28.5%32.3% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency40.7%43.7% — more favorable2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility37.3%81.7%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hopatcong

Elevated or high exposure: strong wind.

Newark

Elevated or high exposure: earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hopatcong
—
Hopatcong: Your Score
63
Area Score
Newark
—
Newark: Your Score
53
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hopatcong, NJ · Newark, NJ · How this is calculated: methodology