Hoover vs Sugar Land

Which is the better fit for you?

Hoover, AL
71
Area Score
Top 11% nationally
Sugar Land, TX
69
Area Score
Top 17% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Hoover receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hoover to Sugar Land

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
9% higher
Regional price level 99.7 against 91.8 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
+$579 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $2,228 in Sugar Land against $1,649 in Hoover.
The median home
4% more
$430,200 in Sugar Land against $412,200 in Hoover.
The weather you would swap
Winters 10°F milder
Normal January lows are 45°F in Sugar Land against 35°F in Hoover; July highs are 95°F against 91°F (summers 4°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Hoover
Sugar Land
Opportunity: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
70 · Top 24%
vs
69 · Top 25%
Growth: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
67 · Top 18%
vs
70 · Top 15%
Climate: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
74 · Top 32%
vs
73 · Top 38%
Physical resilience: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
56 · Bottom 48%
vs
45 · Bottom 35%
Housing affordability: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
74 · Top 28%
vs
71 · Top 38%
Schools: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
84 · Top 7%
vs
83 · Top 8%
Access: Sugar Land is the more favorable of the two.
Access
95 · Top 40%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Hoover is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
71 · Top 21%
vs
68 · Top 29%

Measured values

MetricHooverSugar LandSource period
Population92,642110,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$109,253$136,217 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$57,551$62,018 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density1,865/sq mi2,719/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$412,200$430,2002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,457 — more favorable$1,9572024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,649 — more favorable$2,228FY2026
Cost of living index91.8 — more favorable99.72023
Homeownership rate71.1%80.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate2.9% — more favorable4.6%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.9%+0.2% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate62.6% ±2%63.0% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate4.3% ±1%5.5% ±1.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)69146612 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents7.5 — more favorable4.212 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+61.8%+796.2% — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Average July high91°F95°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low35°F45°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation56.6"49.7"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi2 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.6 min — more favorable31.6 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.442.82024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools25362024-25 school year
Students per teacher15.3 — more favorable16.72024-25 school year
Math proficiency71.1%68.8%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.0%69.7%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility27.7%41.1%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Alabama and Texas do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Hoover

Elevated or high exposure: tornado.

Sugar Land

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hoover
—
Hoover: Your Score
71
Area Score
Sugar Land
—
Sugar Land: Your Score
69
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hoover, AL · Sugar Land, TX · How this is calculated: methodology