Hibbing vs Superior

Which is the better fit for you?

Hibbing, MN
54
Area Score
Bottom 34% nationally
Superior, WI
57
Area Score
Bottom 42% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Superior receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Hibbing to Superior

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 87.2 against 87.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
The same
HUD benchmarks it at $1,232 in Superior against $1,232 in Hibbing.
The median home
39% more
$180,400 in Superior against $130,200 in Hibbing.
The weather you would swap
Winters 6°F milder
Normal January lows are 2°F in Superior against -4°F in Hibbing; July highs are 78°F against 77°F (summers 1°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Hibbing
Superior
Opportunity: Superior is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
21 · Bottom 2%
vs
60 · Top 42%
Growth: Hibbing is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
58 · Top 31%
vs
28 · Bottom 12%
Climate: Superior is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
41 · Bottom 1%
vs
47 · Bottom 1%
Physical resilience: Hibbing is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
94 · Top 7%
vs
75 · Top 31%
Housing affordability: Superior is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
69 · Top 43%
vs
78 · Top 17%
Schools: Hibbing is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
56 · Top 42%
vs
32 · Bottom 28%
Access: Superior is the more favorable of the two.
Access
64 · Bottom 8%
vs
89 · Bottom 39%
Economic stability: Superior is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
39 · Bottom 21%
vs
55 · Bottom 44%

Measured values

MetricHibbingSuperiorSource period
Population16,05726,6772024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$55,789$64,216 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$34,424$37,690 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density88/sq mi728/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$130,200$180,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$833 ±$78$900 ±$702024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,232$1,232FY2026
Cost of living index87.287.22023
Homeownership rate71.1%60.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate5.2%4.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)−3.3%+1.1% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher18.6%29.1% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate15.3% ±4%12.2% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)621112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents3.9 — more favorable0.412 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+675.0%−26.7%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high77°F78°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low-4°F2°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation24.8"31.2"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport52 mi12 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate17.9 min ±1.6 min17.4 min ±0.9 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age45.739.12024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools682024-25 school year
Students per teacher17.014.6 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency54.7%33.1%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency67.1%38.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility47.4%15.3%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

3 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Minnesota and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Hibbing
—
Hibbing: Your Score
54
Area Score
Superior
—
Superior: Your Score
57
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Hibbing, MN · Superior, WI · How this is calculated: methodology