Grosse Pointe Park vs Warren

Which is the better fit for you?

Grosse Pointe Park, MI
63
Area Score
Top 34% nationally
Warren, MI
52
Area Score
Bottom 28% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Grosse Pointe Park receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Grosse Pointe Park to Warren

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
About the same
Regional price level 98.2 against 98.2 (US = 100). Both places sit in the same price region, so the index cannot tell them apart.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$331 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,439 in Warren against $1,770 in Grosse Pointe Park.
The median home
59% less
$193,400 in Warren against $473,100 in Grosse Pointe Park.
The weather you would swap
Similar winters
Normal January lows are 20°F in Warren against 20°F in Grosse Pointe Park; July highs are 84°F against 84°F (summers the same).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Grosse Pointe Park
Warren
Opportunity: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
45 · Bottom 26%
vs
29 · Bottom 6%
Growth: Warren is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
28 · Bottom 12%
vs
46 · Bottom 41%
Climate
63 · Bottom 28%
vs
63 · Bottom 28%
Physical resilience: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
81 · Top 22%
vs
80 · Top 25%
Housing affordability: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
67 · Top 49%
Schools: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
78 · Top 14%
vs
25 · Bottom 18%
Access: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Access
90 · Bottom 39%
vs
89 · Bottom 38%
Economic stability: Grosse Pointe Park is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
77 · Top 8%
vs
47 · Bottom 31%

Measured values

MetricGrosse Pointe ParkWarrenSource period
Population11,319137,9282024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$124,111 — more favorable$64,0162024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$75,142 — more favorable$33,0152024 ACS 5-Year
Population density5,226/sq mi4,012/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$473,100$193,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent — the two are too close to separate$1,379 ±$177$1,225 ±$272024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,770$1,439 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index98.298.22023
Homeownership rate74.4%71.1%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate7.3% — more favorable7.7%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−1.0%−0.6% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher73.3% — more favorable21.0%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate4.2% — more favorable14.4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)310112 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.30.7 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)0.0%+274.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high84°F84°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low20°F20°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation29.9"29.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport25 mi — more favorable26 miNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate26.1 min ±2.1 min26.3 min ±0.5 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age41.438.32024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools3402024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.617.0 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency62.3% — more favorable25.3%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency71.7% — more favorable36.8%2018-19 school year
Free or reduced-price lunch eligibility9.4%74.5%2024-25 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Grosse Pointe Park
—
Grosse Pointe Park: Your Score
63
Area Score
Warren
—
Warren: Your Score
52
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Grosse Pointe Park, MI · Warren, MI · How this is calculated: methodology