Griffith vs Fort Atkinson

Which is the better fit for you?

Griffith, IN
64
Area Score
Top 31% nationally
Fort Atkinson, WI
65
Area Score
Top 27% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Fort Atkinson receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Griffith to Fort Atkinson

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Fort Atkinson, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$54 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,156 in Fort Atkinson against $1,210 in Griffith.
The median home
1% more
$211,800 in Fort Atkinson against $210,100 in Griffith.
The weather you would swap
Winters 7°F colder
Normal January lows are 11°F in Fort Atkinson against 18°F in Griffith; July highs are 83°F against 85°F (summers 2°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

Signals

Griffith
Fort Atkinson
Opportunity: Fort Atkinson is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
61 · Top 40%
vs
72 · Top 20%
Growth: Griffith is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
39 · Bottom 27%
vs
32 · Bottom 17%
Climate: Griffith is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
62 · Bottom 21%
vs
56 · Bottom 7%
Physical resilience
81 · Top 23%
vs
81 · Top 21%
Housing affordability: Fort Atkinson is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
78 · Top 18%
vs
84 · Top 7%
Schools: Griffith is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
50 · Top 50%
vs
48 · Bottom 48%
Access: Griffith is the more favorable of the two.
Access
98 · Top 21%
vs
86 · Bottom 30%
Economic stability: Fort Atkinson is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
67 · Top 31%
vs
72 · Top 19%

Measured values

MetricGriffithFort AtkinsonSource period
Population16,27312,4632024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$76,636 ±$5,446$79,302 ±$8,0422024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income — the two are too close to separate$40,565 ±$3,155$38,229 ±$3,0722024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,095/sq mi2,132/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$210,100$211,8002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,235$961 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,210$1,156 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate71.7%68.5%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.7%2.9% — more favorableJuly 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.4%+0.4%July 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher — the two are too close to separate27.9% ±4%26.2% ±4%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate7.0% ±3%6.8% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)41212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.21.0 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−5.3%−87.0%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F83°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low18°F11°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation33.4"35.5"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport6 mi — more favorable29 miNASR current cycle
Average commute30.8 min22.4 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age37.543.52024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher14.112.4 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency42.0%40.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency47.2%40.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

4 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Indiana and Wisconsin do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Griffith

No hazard reaches elevated exposure.

Fort Atkinson

Elevated or high exposure: hail, tornado.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Griffith
—
Griffith: Your Score
64
Area Score
Fort Atkinson
—
Fort Atkinson: Your Score
65
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Griffith, IN · Fort Atkinson, WI · How this is calculated: methodology