Gretna vs Caño Martin Peña

Which is the better fit for you?

Gretna, LA
48
Area Score
Bottom 14% nationally
Caño Martin Peña, PR
45
Area Score
Bottom 9% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Gretna receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Gretna to Caño Martin Peña

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
The Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes no regional price index for Caño Martin Peña, so nothing here is estimated in its place.
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Needs a price index for both places.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$668 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $663 in Caño Martin Peña against $1,331 in Gretna.
The median home
59% less
$105,400 in Caño Martin Peña against $257,400 in Gretna.
The weather you would swap
Winters 25°F milder
Normal January lows are 72°F in Caño Martin Peña against 47°F in Gretna; July highs are 89°F against 94°F (summers 5°F cooler).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

28 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Gretna
Caño Martin Peña
Opportunity: Caño Martin Peña is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
50 · Bottom 38%
vs
51 · Bottom 39%
Growth: Caño Martin Peña is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
24 · Bottom 8%
vs
39 · Bottom 28%
Climate: Gretna is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
78 · Top 21%
vs
69 · Bottom 45%
Physical resilience: Gretna is the more favorable of the two.
Physical resilience
31 · Bottom 24%
vs
17 · Bottom 11%
Housing affordability: Caño Martin Peña is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
39 · Bottom 9%
vs
42 · Bottom 12%
Schools: Gretna is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
56 · Top 41%
vs
46 · Bottom 45%
Access: Caño Martin Peña is the more favorable of the two.
Access
92 · Bottom 49%
vs
97 · Top 31%
Economic stability: Gretna is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
24 · Bottom 5%
vs
9 · Bottom 1%

Measured values

MetricGretnaCaño Martin PeñaSource period
Population17,38911,6182024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income$43,110 — more favorable$19,1492024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$29,607 — more favorable$13,1562024 ACS 5-Year
Population density4,308/sq mi16,887/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$257,400$105,4002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,060$578 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,331$663 — more favorableFY2026
Homeownership rate48.8%53.3%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate4.1% — more favorable4.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)+0.1%+2.8% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher24.5% — more favorable12.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate26.2% — more favorable59.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)99212 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents0.5 — more favorable0.312 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)−10.0%−55.8%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high94°F89°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low47°F72°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation64.6"59.9"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport14 mi3 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute — the two are too close to separate28.0 min ±3.1 min26.6 min ±2.0 min2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age38.347.42024 ACS 5-Year
Students per teacher16.39.3 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency70.1%27.4%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency71.9%43.7%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

One row above shows both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison. The year-over-year change is not marked either: a percentage on fewer than 300 units swings on a handful of permits.

Louisiana and Puerto Rico do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Gretna

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Caño Martin Peña

Elevated or high exposure: hurricane.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Gretna
—
Gretna: Your Score
48
Area Score
Caño Martin Peña
—
Caño Martin Peña: Your Score
45
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Gretna, LA · Caño Martin Peña, PR · How this is calculated: methodology