Greenwood vs Wade Hampton

Which is the better fit for you?

Greenwood, IN
73
Area Score
Top 7% nationally
Wade Hampton, SC
75
Area Score
Top 4% nationally

Want a third or fourth place beside these? Open them in the shortlist and add more.

Wade Hampton receives the higher standardized Area Score. That reflects AreaProfile's weighting, not a judgment about which place is better to live in.

If you are moving

What the difference in prices, rent, homes and weather comes to, using the published figures for the two places. Add your income to see what it would take to keep pace.

Moving from Greenwood to Wade Hampton

It stays in this browser and is never sent anywhere.

Everyday prices
2% lower
Regional price level 93.1 against 94.7 (US = 100)
Income to keep the same purchasing power
Enter your household income to see it.
A new two-bedroom lease
−$431 a month
HUD benchmarks it at $1,339 in Wade Hampton against $1,770 in Greenwood.
The median home
23% more
$339,000 in Wade Hampton against $276,100 in Greenwood.
The weather you would swap
Winters 14°F milder
Normal January lows are 35°F in Wade Hampton against 21°F in Greenwood; July highs are 91°F against 85°F (summers 6°F hotter).

These are differences between published figures, not a forecast of your budget. Income and sales taxes, commuting, schools, insurance and the job you would actually get are not in them, and a price index describes a metropolitan area, so two places in one metro read the same. HUD’s rent is a benchmark for a new lease, not a listing.

32 occupations have a published median wage in both places. Start typing, or choose from the list.

Median wages are the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ metro figures for that occupation, not a job offer, and the price level is the regional index; neither includes taxes, benefits or how senior you are.

Signals

Greenwood
Wade Hampton
Opportunity: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Opportunity
75 · Top 16%
vs
84 · Top 3%
Growth: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Growth
70 · Top 15%
vs
71 · Top 14%
Climate: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Climate
67 · Bottom 39%
vs
70 · Bottom 48%
Physical resilience
64 · Top 43%
vs
64 · Top 44%
Housing affordability: Greenwood is the more favorable of the two.
Housing affordability
81 · Top 11%
vs
73 · Top 30%
Schools: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Schools
71 · Top 23%
vs
78 · Top 14%
Access: Wade Hampton is the more favorable of the two.
Access
96 · Top 33%
vs
98 · Top 21%
Economic stability: Greenwood is the more favorable of the two.
Economic stability
70 · Top 24%
vs
65 · Top 35%

Measured values

MetricGreenwoodWade HamptonSource period
Population66,02920,8982024 ACS 5-Year
Median household income — the two are too close to separate$83,608 ±$4,695$77,449 ±$5,2222024 ACS 5-Year
Per capita income$40,074$43,359 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Population density2,301/sq mi2,381/sq mi2024 ACS 5-Year
Median home value$276,100$339,0002024 ACS 5-Year
Median gross rent$1,312$1,115 — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Market rent, two bedroom$1,770$1,339 — more favorableFY2026
Cost of living index94.793.1 — more favorable2023
Homeownership rate59.3%64.6%2024 ACS 5-Year
Unemployment rate3.2% — more favorable3.5%July 2026
Employment change (year over year)−0.9%+4.5% — more favorableJuly 2026
Bachelor's degree or higher33.4%46.0% — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Poverty rate — the two are too close to separate6.8% ±2%6.7% ±2%2024 ACS 5-Year
Housing units permitted (12 months)4174,87312 months ending July 2026
Permits per 1,000 residents6.38.9 — more favorable12 months ending July 2026
Permit change (year over year)+18.1% — more favorable−10.1%12 months ending July 2026
Average July high85°F91°F1991-2020 Normals
Average January low21°F35°F1991-2020 Normals
Annual precipitation43.6"47.0"1991-2020 Normals
Distance to major airport13 mi9 mi — more favorableNASR current cycle
Average commute26.8 min21.8 min — more favorable2024 ACS 5-Year
Median age36.438.92024 ACS 5-Year
Public schools1752024-25 school year
Students per teacher18.114.9 — more favorable2024-25 school year
Math proficiency59.6%65.2%2018-19 school year
Reading proficiency64.5%63.1%2018-19 school year

A bolded value is the more favorable of the two where the metric has a clear direction. Metrics like population and density have no inherent better or worse and are shown unweighted.

2 rows above show both figures with a ± margin and neither in bold. Those come from the American Community Survey, which samples rather than counts, and the gap between the two is smaller than the uncertainty on the figures themselves — so the survey did not find a difference to report, and calling either one the winner would be reading a result out of noise.

The number of units permitted is not marked because the larger place always permits more; the per-resident rate is the fair comparison.

Indiana and South Carolina do not give the same test. Each state writes its own assessment and sets its own passing score, so the two proficiency rows above are not directly comparable — the difference between them partly measures which standard is harder. Students per teacher and the school count are unaffected, and each profile ranks its own proficiency within its own state.

Physical risk tradeoff

Greenwood

Elevated or high exposure: tornado, earthquake.

Wade Hampton

Elevated or high exposure: ice storm, earthquake.

Your best match

Weight what matters to you. Your preferences stay in this browser and never change either Area Score.

Greenwood
—
Greenwood: Your Score
73
Area Score
Wade Hampton
—
Wade Hampton: Your Score
75
Area Score

Select your priorities to see which of the two fits them better.

Full profiles: Greenwood, IN · Wade Hampton, SC · How this is calculated: methodology